Overview of TREC 2024 Biomedical Generative Retrieval (BioGen) Track
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the advancement of large language models (LLMs), the biomedical domain has seen significant progress and improvement in multiple tasks such as biomedical question answering, lay language summarization of the biomedical literature, clinical note summarization, etc. However, hallucinations or confabulations remain one of the key challenges when using LLMs in the biomedical and other domains. Inaccuracies may be particularly harmful in high-risk situations, such as medical question answering, making clinical decisions, or appraising biomedical research. Studies on the evaluation of the LLMs abilities to ground generated statements in verifiable sources have shown that models perform significantly worse on lay-user-generated questions, and often fail to reference relevant sources. This can be problematic when those seeking information want evidence from studies to back up the claims from LLMs. Unsupported statements are a major barrier to using LLMs in any applications that may affect health. Methods for grounding generated statements in reliable sources along with practical evaluation approaches are needed to overcome this barrier. Towards this, in our pilot task organized at TREC 2024, we introduced the task of reference attribution as a means to mitigate the generation of false statements by LLMs answering biomedical questions.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026Deep Research, Shallow Evaluation: A Case Study in Meta-Evaluation for Long-Form QA Benchmarkscited by 5
- 2025Seeing Through the MiRAGE: Evaluating Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026DoGMaTiQ: Automated Generation of Question-and-Answer Nuggets for Report Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025Automated Evaluation can Distinguish the Good and Bad AI Responses to Patient Questions about Hospitalizationcited by 0
- 2026eTracer: Polarity-Aware Evidence Groundingcited by 0
- 2026BioACE: An Automated Framework for Biomedical Answer and Citation Evaluationscited by 0
- 2026DoGMaTiQ: Automated Generation of Question-and-Answer Nuggets for Report Evaluation6 May 2026
- 2026Deep Research, Shallow Evaluation: A Case Study in Meta-Evaluation for Long-Form QA Benchmarks6 Mar 2026
- 2026BioACE: An Automated Framework for Biomedical Answer and Citation Evaluations4 Feb 2026
- 2026eTracer: Polarity-Aware Evidence Grounding7 Jan 2026
- 2025Seeing Through the MiRAGE: Evaluating Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation28 Oct 2025
- 2025Automated Evaluation can Distinguish the Good and Bad AI Responses to Patient Questions about Hospitalization1 Oct 2025
- 2025Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language Models21 Aug 2025