mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Curvature in the Looking-Glass: Optimal Methods to Exploit Curvature of Expectation in the Loss Landscape

arXiv 2411.16914 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Harnessing the local topography of the loss landscape is a central challenge in advanced optimization tasks. By accounting for the effect of potential parameter changes, we can alter the model more efficiently. Contrary to standard assumptions, we find that the Hessian does not always approximate loss curvature well, particularly near gradient discontinuities, which commonly arise in deep learning architectures. We present a new conceptual framework to understand how curvature of expected changes in loss emerges in architectures with many rectified linear units. Each ReLU creates a parameter boundary that, when crossed, induces a pseudorandom gradient perturbation. Our derivations show how these discontinuities combine to form a glass-like structure, similar to amorphous solids that contain microscopic domains of strong, but random, atomic alignment. By estimating the density of the resulting gradient variations, we can bound how the loss may change with parameter movement. Our analysis includes the optimal kernel and sample distribution for approximating glass density from ordinary gradient evaluations. We also derive the optimal modification to quasi-Newton steps that incorporate both glass and Hessian terms, as well as certain exactness properties that are possible with Nesterov-accelerated gradient updates. Our algorithm, Alice, tests these techniques to determine which curvature terms are most impactful for training a given architecture and dataset. Additional safeguards enforce stable exploitation through step bounds that expand on the functionality of Adam. These theoretical and experimental tools lay groundwork to improve future efforts (e.g., pruning and quantization) by providing new insight into the loss landscape.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2024.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  4. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  5. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  6. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
  7. 2018Efficient Attention: Attention with Linear Complexitiescited by 368
  8. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
  9. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 289
  10. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
  11. 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 202
  12. 2019A Tensorized Transformer for Language Modelingcited by 86
7 more
  1. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 67
  2. 2022On the Maximum Hessian Eigenvalue and Generalizationcited by 57
  3. 2022Understanding and Combating Robust Overfitting via Input Loss Landscape Analysis and Regularizationcited by 22
  4. 2023Jumping through Local Minima: Quantization in the Loss Landscape of Vision Transformerscited by 18
  5. 2023Understanding Hessian Alignment for Domain Generalizationcited by 15
  6. 2019A Stochastic Quasi-Newton Method with Nesterov's Accelerated Gradientcited by 3
  7. 2023Projective Integral Updates for High-Dimensional Variational Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Overparametrization bends the landscape: BBP transitions at initialization in simple Neural Networks
  2. 2026SoftServe: A Scalable Quasi-Newton Method for Deep Learning
  3. 2026Diffusion Model's Generalization Can Be Characterized by Inductive Biases toward a Data-Dependent Ridge Manifold
  4. 2026ATLAS: A Foundation Neural Sampler for Amorphous Materials
  5. 2025Boltzmann generators for amorphous particle systems
  6. 2026Loss Curvature as a Sampling-Free Proxy for Memorization in Diffusion Models
  7. 2025A Generative Diffusion Model for Amorphous Materials
  8. 2026The Lifecycle of the Spectral Edge: From Gradient Learning to Weight-Decay Compression