mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Foundation Models To learn the shape of semi-fluid deformable objects

arXiv 2411.16802 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the difficulties imposed on the manipulation of deformable objects is their characterization and the detection of representative keypoints for the purpose of manipulation. A keen interest was manifested by researchers in the last decade to characterize and manipulate deformable objects of non-fluid nature, such as clothes and ropes. Even though several propositions were made in the regard of object characterization, however researchers were always confronted with the need of pixel-level information of the object through images to extract relevant information. This usually is accomplished by means of segmentation networks trained on manually labeled data for this purpose. In this paper, we address the subject of characterizing weld pool to define stable features that serve as information for further motion control objectives. We achieve this by employing different pipelines. The first one consists of characterizing fluid deformable objects through the use of a generative model that is trained using a teacher-student framework. And in the second one we leverage foundation models by using them as teachers to characterize the object in the image, without the need of any pre-training and any dataset. The performance of knowledge distillation from foundation models into a smaller generative model shows prominent results in the characterization of deformable objects. The student network was capable of learning to retrieve the keypoitns of the object with an error of 13.4 pixels. And the teacher was evaluated based on its capacities to retrieve pixel level information represented by the object mask, with a mean Intersection Over Union (mIoU) of 75.26%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2024.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  2. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
  5. 2016Unsupervised CNN for Single View Depth Estimation: Geometry to the Rescuecited by 368
  6. 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 359
  7. 2023Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlookcited by 109
  8. 2022RoboCraft: Learning to See, Simulate, and Shape Elasto-Plastic Objects with Graph Networkscited by 69
  9. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of State Estimation for Manipulating Deformable Linear Objectscited by 44
  10. 2020Learning 3D Dynamic Scene Representations for Robot Manipulationcited by 39
  11. 2019Learning Continuous 3D Reconstructions for Geometrically Aware Graspingcited by 28
  12. 2020SuPer Deep: A Surgical Perception Framework for Robotic Tissue Manipulation using Deep Learning for Feature Extractioncited by 28
6 more
  1. 2018Indoor Scene Understanding in 2.5/3D for Autonomous Agents: A Surveycited by 25
  2. 2022Robot Cooking with Stir-fry: Bimanual Non-prehensile Manipulation of Semi-fluid Objectscited by 24
  3. 2023A Survey on Robotic Manipulation of Deformable Objects: Recent Advances, Open Challenges and New Frontierscited by 7
  4. 2021Vision Transformer for Learning Driving Policies in Complex Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 5
  5. 2016Motion Planning for Fluid Manipulation using Simplified Dynamicscited by 2
  6. 2022Semantic State Estimation in Cloth Manipulation Taskscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.