mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Gradient dynamics for low-rank fine-tuning beyond kernels

arXiv 2411.15385 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2024cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LoRA has emerged as one of the de facto methods for fine-tuning foundation models with low computational cost and memory footprint. The idea is to only train a low-rank perturbation to the weights of a pre-trained model, given supervised data for a downstream task. Despite its empirical sucess, from a mathematical perspective it remains poorly understood what learning mechanisms ensure that gradient descent converges to useful low-rank perturbations. In this work we study low-rank fine-tuning in a student-teacher setting. We are given the weights of a two-layer base model f, as well as i.i.d. samples (x,f^*(x)) where x is Gaussian and f^* is the teacher model given by perturbing the weights of f by a rank-1 matrix. This generalizes the setting of generalized linear model (GLM) regression where the weights of f are zero. When the rank-1 perturbation is comparable in norm to the weight matrix of f, the training dynamics are nonlinear. Nevertheless, in this regime we prove under mild assumptions that a student model which is initialized at the base model and trained with online gradient descent will converge to the teacher in dkO(1) iterations, where k is the number of neurons in f. Importantly, unlike in the GLM setting, the complexity does not depend on fine-grained properties of the activation's Hermite expansion. We also prove that in our setting, learning the teacher model "from scratch'' can require significantly more iterations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2024.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  2. 2023ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updatescited by 204
  3. 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
  4. 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 143
  5. 2022On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 141
  6. 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 121
  7. 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
  8. 2022Learning Single-Index Models with Shallow Neural Networkscited by 92
  9. 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 61
  10. 2020Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descentcited by 58
  11. 2024The Benefits of Reusing Batches for Gradient Descent in Two-Layer Networks: Breaking the Curse of Information and Leap Exponentscited by 52
  12. 2020Algorithms and SQ Lower Bounds for PAC Learning One-Hidden-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 49
8 more
  1. 2024LoRA Training in the NTK Regime has No Spurious Local Minimacited by 48
  2. 2024Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limitcited by 46
  3. 2024Repetita Iuvant: Data Repetition Allows SGD to Learn High-Dimensional Multi-Index Functionscited by 37
  4. 2020Learning Polynomials of Few Relevant Dimensionscited by 34
  5. 2020Learning Deep ReLU Networks Is Fixed-Parameter Tractablecited by 26
  6. 2023Learning Narrow One-Hidden-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 14
  7. 2023A faster and simpler algorithm for learning shallow networkscited by 7
  8. 2023Efficiently Learning One-Hidden-Layer ReLU Networks via Schur Polynomialscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.