mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Pruning of Text-to-Image Models: Insights from Pruning Stable Diffusion

arXiv 2411.15113 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

As text-to-image models grow increasingly powerful and complex, their burgeoning size presents a significant obstacle to widespread adoption, especially on resource-constrained devices. This paper presents a pioneering study on post-training pruning of Stable Diffusion 2, addressing the critical need for model compression in text-to-image domain. Our study tackles the pruning techniques for the previously unexplored multi-modal generation models, and particularly examines the pruning impact on the textual component and the image generation component separately. We conduct a comprehensive comparison on pruning the model or the single component of the model in various sparsities. Our results yield previously undocumented findings. For example, contrary to established trends in language model pruning, we discover that simple magnitude pruning outperforms more advanced techniques in text-to-image context. Furthermore, our results show that Stable Diffusion 2 can be pruned to 38.5% sparsity with minimal quality loss, achieving a significant reduction in model size. We propose an optimal pruning configuration that prunes the text encoder to 47.5% and the diffusion generator to 35%. This configuration maintains image generation quality while substantially reducing computational requirements. In addition, our work uncovers intriguing questions about information encoding in text-to-image models: we observe that pruning beyond certain thresholds leads to sudden performance drops (unreadable images), suggesting that specific weights encode critical semantics information. This finding opens new avenues for future research in model compression, interoperability, and bias identification in text-to-image models. By providing crucial insights into the pruning behavior of text-to-image models, our study lays the groundwork for developing more efficient and accessible AI-driven image generation systems

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 9 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2024.

Builds on

9 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr

Other references · 8

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  4. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  5. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
  6. 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 110
  7. 2024LD-Pruner: Efficient Pruning of Latent Diffusion Models using Task-Agnostic Insightscited by 65
  8. 2022Outliers Dimensions that Disrupt Transformers Are Driven by Frequencycited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CAT Pruning: Cluster-Aware Token Pruning For Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  2. 2025Skrr: Skip and Re-use Text Encoder Layers for Memory Efficient Text-to-Image Generation
  3. 2025Reusing Computation in Text-to-Image Diffusion for Efficient Generation of Image Sets
  4. 2026i1: A Simple and Fully Open Recipe for Strong Text-to-Image Models
  5. 2025Exploring the Deep Fusion of Large Language Models and Diffusion Transformers for Text-to-Image Synthesis
  6. 2022Self-conditioned Embedding Diffusion for Text Generation
  7. 2024Boosting Alignment for Post-Unlearning Text-to-Image Generative Models
  8. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding