mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Large Language Models

arXiv 2411.14500 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in the field of artificial intelligence, showcasing their ability to interact with humans and influence human cognition through information dissemination. However, recent studies have brought to light instances of bias inherent within these LLMs, presenting a critical issue that demands attention. In our research, we delve deeper into the intricate challenge of harmonising accuracy and fairness in the enhancement of LLMs. While improving accuracy can indeed enhance overall LLM performance, it often occurs at the expense of fairness. Overemphasising optimisation of one metric invariably leads to a significant degradation of the other. This underscores the necessity of taking into account multiple considerations during the design and optimisation phases of LLMs. Therefore, we advocate for reformulating the LLM training process as a multi-objective learning task. Our investigation reveals that multi-objective evolutionary learning (MOEL) methodologies offer promising avenues for tackling this challenge. Our MOEL framework enables the simultaneous optimisation of both accuracy and fairness metrics, resulting in a Pareto-optimal set of LLMs. In summary, our study sheds valuable lights on the delicate equilibrium between accuracy and fairness within LLMs, which is increasingly significant for their real-world applications. By harnessing MOEL, we present a promising pathway towards fairer and more efficacious AI technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2024.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  5. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  6. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  7. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 531
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
  9. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
  10. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  11. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
  12. 2024Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 58
7 more
  1. 2024Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysiscited by 48
  2. 2022NoisyTune: A Little Noise Can Help You Finetune Pretrained Language Models Bettercited by 43
  3. 2023Three-Way Trade-Off in Multi-Objective Learning: Optimization, Generalization and Conflict-Avoidancecited by 36
  4. 2023Should We Attend More or Less? Modulating Attention for Fairnesscited by 11
  5. 2022Mitigating Unfairness via Evolutionary Multi-objective Ensemble Learningcited by 8
  6. 2024Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Modelscited by 4
  7. 2024Multi-Objective Neural Architecture Search by Learning Search Space Partitionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.