mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Meaning at the Planck scale? Contextualized word embeddings for doing history, philosophy, and sociology of science

arXiv 2411.14073 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2024cs.CL physics.hist-phcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the potential of contextualized word embeddings (CWEs) as a new tool in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS) for studying contextual and evolving meanings of scientific concepts. Using the term "Planck" as a test case, I evaluate five BERT-based models with varying degrees of domain-specific pretraining, including my custom model Astro-HEP-BERT, trained on the Astro-HEP Corpus, a dataset containing 21.84 million paragraphs from 600,000 articles in astrophysics and high-energy physics. For this analysis, I compiled two labeled datasets: (1) the Astro-HEP-Planck Corpus, consisting of 2,900 labeled occurrences of "Planck" sampled from 1,500 paragraphs in the Astro-HEP Corpus, and (2) a physics-related Wikipedia dataset comprising 1,186 labeled occurrences of "Planck" across 885 paragraphs. Results demonstrate that the domain-adapted models outperform the general-purpose ones in disambiguating the target term, predicting its known meanings, and generating high-quality sense clusters, as measured by a novel purity indicator I developed. Additionally, this approach reveals semantic shifts in the target term over three decades in the unlabeled Astro-HEP Corpus, highlighting the emergence of the Planck space mission as a dominant sense. The study underscores the importance of domain-specific pretraining for analyzing scientific language and demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of adapting pretrained models for HPSS research. By offering a scalable and transferable method for modeling the meanings of scientific concepts, CWEs open up new avenues for investigating the socio-historical dynamics of scientific discourses.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2024.

Builds on

19 of 64 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  6. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  7. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
  8. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  9. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
  10. 2019Does BERT Make Any Sense? Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 56
  11. 2021Building astroBERT, a language model for Astronomy & Astrophysicscited by 19
  12. 2022TempoWiC: An Evaluation Benchmark for Detecting Meaning Shift in Social Mediacited by 19
7 more
  1. 2024PhysBERT: A Text Embedding Model for Physics Scientific Literaturecited by 8
  2. 2020Analysis and Evaluation of Language Models for Word Sense Disambiguationcited by 6
  3. 2023Is Anisotropy Inherent to Transformers?cited by 5
  4. 2024Isotropy, Clusters, and Classifierscited by 4
  5. 2022Improving astroBERT using Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 3
  6. 2024Tracing the Development of the Virtual Particle Concept Using Semantic Change Detectioncited by 3
  7. 2023Computational modeling of semantic changecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.