mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can ChatGPT Overcome Behavioral Biases in the Financial Sector? Classify-and-Rethink: Multi-Step Zero-Shot Reasoning in the Gold Investment

arXiv 2411.13599 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2024q-fin.ST cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success recently, displaying exceptional capabilities in creating understandable and organized text. These LLMs have been utilized in diverse fields, such as clinical research, where domain-specific models like Med-Palm have achieved human-level performance. Recently, researchers have employed advanced prompt engineering to enhance the general reasoning ability of LLMs. Despite the remarkable success of zero-shot Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) in solving general reasoning tasks, the potential of these methods still remains paid limited attention in the financial reasoning task.To address this issue, we explore multiple prompt strategies and incorporated semantic news information to improve LLMs' performance on financial reasoning tasks.To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to explore this important issue by applying ChatGPT to the gold investment.In this work, our aim is to investigate the financial reasoning capabilities of LLMs and their capacity to generate logical and persuasive investment opinions. We will use ChatGPT, one of the most powerful LLMs recently, and prompt engineering to achieve this goal. Our research will focus on understanding the ability of LLMs in sophisticated analysis and reasoning within the context of investment decision-making. Our study finds that ChatGPT with CoT prompt can provide more explainable predictions and overcome behavioral biases, which is crucial in finance-related tasks and can achieve higher investment returns.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2024.

Builds on

19 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Beyond Classification: Financial Reasoning in State-of-the-Art Language Models30 Apr

Other references · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  7. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
  8. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  9. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  10. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 939
  11. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Modelscited by 688
  12. 2019FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 385
6 more
  1. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 350
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 307
  3. 2023Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 147
  4. 2022WHEN FLUE MEETS FLANG: Benchmarks and Large Pre-trained Language Model for Financial Domaincited by 117
  5. 2023The Wall Street Neophyte: A Zero-Shot Analysis of ChatGPT Over MultiModal Stock Movement Prediction Challengescited by 59
  6. 2023Removing Non-Stationary Knowledge From Pre-Trained Language Models for Entity-Level Sentiment Classification in Financecited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Can GPT models be Financial Analysts? An Evaluation of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on mock CFA Exams
  2. 2023Zero-Shot Question Answering over Financial Documents using Large Language Models
  3. 2025Reasoning or Overthinking: Evaluating Large Language Models on Financial Sentiment Analysis
  4. 2026The Price of Thought: Does Test-Time Reasoning Pay in LLM Trading?
  5. 2025What Factors Affect LLMs and RLLMs in Financial Question Answering?
  6. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Financial Reasoning: A CFA-Based Benchmark Study
  7. 2023GPT-3 Models are Few-Shot Financial Reasoners
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?