Low-resource Machine Translation: what for? who for? An observational study on a dedicated Tetun language translation service
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-resource machine translation (MT) presents a diversity of community needs and application challenges that remain poorly understood. To complement surveys and focus groups, which tend to rely on small samples of respondents, we propose an observational study on actual usage patterns of tetun.org, a specialized MT service for the Tetun language, which is the lingua franca in Timor-Leste. Our analysis of 100,000 translation requests reveals patterns that challenge assumptions based on existing corpora. We find that users, many of them students on mobile devices, typically translate text from a high-resource language into Tetun across diverse domains including science, healthcare, and daily life. This contrasts sharply with available Tetun corpora, which are dominated by news articles covering government and social issues. Our results suggest that MT systems for institutionalized minority languages like Tetun should prioritize accuracy on domains relevant to educational contexts, in the high-resource to low-resource direction. More broadly, this study demonstrates how observational analysis can inform low-resource language technology development, by grounding research in practical community needs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2024.
Builds on
15 of 43 references.
References · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
- 2023MADLAD-400: A Multilingual And Document-Level Large Audited Datasetcited by 181
- 2021Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Surveycited by 109
- 2021Survey of Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 92
- 2021Domain Adaptation and Multi-Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation: A Surveycited by 46
- 2024Goldfish: Monolingual Language Models for 350 Languagescited by 29
- 2022What a Creole Wants, What a Creole Needscited by 27
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Machine Translation of Indigenous Languages: Giving a Voice to the Speakerscited by 27
- 2022Not always about you: Prioritizing community needs when developing endangered language technologycited by 21
- 2024What Do Dialect Speakers Want? A Survey of Attitudes Towards Language Technology for German Dialectscited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026The Impact of AI-Generated Text on the Internetcited by 6
- 2026Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intentcited by 1
- 2025SEA-SafeguardBench: Evaluating AI Safety in SEA Languages and Culturescited by 0
- 2026Vavanagi: a Community-run Platform for Documentation of the Hula Language in Papua New Guineacited by 0
- 2026MUDIDI: A Two-Stage Framework for Multilingual Dictionary Digitization with Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026MUDIDI: A Two-Stage Framework for Multilingual Dictionary Digitization with Language Models8 Jun 2026
- 2026Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent2 Jun 2026
- 2026The Impact of AI-Generated Text on the Internet14 Apr 2026
- 2026Vavanagi: a Community-run Platform for Documentation of the Hula Language in Papua New Guinea15 Mar 2026
- 2025SEA-SafeguardBench: Evaluating AI Safety in SEA Languages and Cultures5 Dec 2025