Mitigating Gender Bias in Contextual Word Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Word embeddings have been shown to produce remarkable results in tackling a vast majority of NLP related tasks. Unfortunately, word embeddings also capture the stereotypical biases that are prevalent in society, affecting the predictive performance of the embeddings when used in downstream tasks. While various techniques have been proposed citebolukbasi2016man, zhao2018learning and criticizedcitegonen2019lipstick for static embeddings, very little work has focused on mitigating bias in contextual embeddings. In this paper, we propose a novel objective function for MLM(Masked-Language Modeling) which largely mitigates the gender bias in contextual embeddings and also preserves the performance for downstream tasks. Since previous works on measuring bias in contextual embeddings lack in normative reasoning, we also propose novel evaluation metrics that are straight-forward and aligned with our motivations in debiasing. We also propose new methods for debiasing static embeddings and provide empirical proof via extensive analysis and experiments, as to why the main source of bias in static embeddings stems from the presence of stereotypical names rather than gendered words themselves. All experiments and embeddings studied are in English, unless otherwise specified.citepbender2011achieving.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
9 more
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 276
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
- 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
- 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 171
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2019Attenuating Bias in Word Vectorscited by 64
- 2020Double-Hard Debias: Tailoring Word Embeddings for Gender Bias Mitigationcited by 36
- 2020Nurse is Closer to Woman than Surgeon? Mitigating Gender-Biased Proximities in Word Embeddingscited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.