mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Infinite Width Limits of Self Supervised Neural Networks

arXiv 2411.11176 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The NTK is a widely used tool in the theoretical analysis of deep learning, allowing us to look at supervised deep neural networks through the lenses of kernel regression. Recently, several works have investigated kernel models for self-supervised learning, hypothesizing that these also shed light on the behavior of wide neural networks by virtue of the NTK. However, it remains an open question to what extent this connection is mathematically sound -- it is a commonly encountered misbelief that the kernel behavior of wide neural networks emerges irrespective of the loss function it is trained on. In this paper, we bridge the gap between the NTK and self-supervised learning, focusing on two-layer neural networks trained under the Barlow Twins loss. We prove that the NTK of Barlow Twins indeed becomes constant as the width of the network approaches infinity. Our analysis technique is a bit different from previous works on the NTK and may be of independent interest. Overall, our work provides a first justification for the use of classic kernel theory to understand self-supervised learning of wide neural networks. Building on this result, we derive generalization error bounds for kernelized Barlow Twins and connect them to neural networks of finite width.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2024.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  3. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  4. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  5. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
  6. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
  7. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
  8. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  9. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  10. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 187
  11. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 180
  12. 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
9 more
  1. 2023The SSL Interplay: Augmentations, Inductive Bias, and Generalizationcited by 40
  2. 2023On the Stepwise Nature of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 36
  3. 2022Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant Functionscited by 32
  4. 2021The Eigenlearning Framework: A Conservation Law Perspective on Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 26
  5. 2022What shapes the loss landscape of self-supervised learning?cited by 19
  6. 2023Beyond the Universal Law of Robustness: Sharper Laws for Random Features and Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 13
  7. 2022Joint Embedding Self-Supervised Learning in the Kernel Regimecited by 12
  8. 2023Non-Parametric Representation Learning with Kernelscited by 11
  9. 2024When can we Approximate Wide Contrastive Models with Neural Tangent Kernels and Principal Component Analysis?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.