mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-Parametric Representation Learning with Kernels

arXiv 2309.02028 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning has become popular in recent years for learning useful features from unlabelled data. Representation learning has been mostly developed in the neural network literature, and other models for representation learning are surprisingly unexplored. In this work, we introduce and analyze several kernel-based representation learning approaches: Firstly, we define two kernel Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) models using contrastive loss functions and secondly, a Kernel Autoencoder (AE) model based on the idea of embedding and reconstructing data. We argue that the classical representer theorems for supervised kernel machines are not always applicable for (self-supervised) representation learning, and present new representer theorems, which show that the representations learned by our kernel models can be expressed in terms of kernel matrices. We further derive generalisation error bounds for representation learning with kernel SSL and AE, and empirically evaluate the performance of these methods in both small data regimes as well as in comparison with neural network based models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

30 of 72 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  5. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  6. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  7. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  8. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 657
  9. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
  10. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  11. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  12. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
18 more
  1. 2016Towards K-means-friendly Spaces: Simultaneous Deep Learning and Clusteringcited by 237
  2. 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 142
  3. 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
  4. 2019Limitations of Lazy Training of Two-layers Neural Networkscited by 87
  5. 2020Deep Equals Shallow for ReLU Networks in Kernel Regimescited by 85
  6. 2022A Survey on Masked Autoencoder for Self-supervised Learning in Vision and Beyondcited by 58
  7. 2019Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoderscited by 46
  8. 2019Overparameterized Neural Networks Implement Associative Memorycited by 45
  9. 2018Learning with SGD and Random Featurescited by 33
  10. 2022Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant Functionscited by 32
  11. 2022The dynamics of representation learning in shallow, non-linear autoencoderscited by 27
  12. 2016WarpNet: Weakly Supervised Matching for Single-view Reconstructioncited by 22
  13. 2023Understanding Augmentation-based Self-Supervised Representation Learning via RKHS Approximation and Regressioncited by 20
  14. 2018Learning Dynamics of Linear Denoising Autoencoderscited by 16
  15. 2019Benefits of Jointly Training Autoencoders: An Improved Neural Tangent Kernel Analysiscited by 13
  16. 2022Joint Embedding Self-Supervised Learning in the Kernel Regimecited by 12
  17. 2016Minimax Lower Bounds for Realizable Transductive Classificationcited by 8
  18. 2016Bounds for Vector-Valued Function Estimationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

11 papers.