An AI Theory of Mind Will Enhance Our Collective Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collective intelligence plays a central role in many fields, from economics and evolutionary theory to neural networks and eusocial insects, and is also core to work on emergence and self-organisation in complex-systems theory. However, in human collective intelligence there is still much to understand about how specific psychological processes at the individual level give rise to self-organised structures at the social level. Psychological factors have so far played a minor role in collective-intelligence studies because the principles are often general and applicable to agents without sophisticated psychologies. We emphasise, with examples from other complex adaptive systems, the broad applicability of collective-intelligence principles, while noting that mechanisms and time scales differ markedly between cases. We review evidence that flexible collective intelligence in human social settings is improved by a particular cognitive tool: our Theory of Mind. We then hypothesise that AIs equipped with a theory of mind will enhance collective intelligence in ways similar to human contributions. To make this case, we step back from the algorithmic basis of AI psychology and consider the large-scale impact AI can have as agential actors in a 'social ecology' rather than as mere technological tools. We identify several key characteristics of psychologically mediated collective intelligence and show that the development of a Theory of Mind is crucial in distinguishing human social collective intelligence from more general forms. Finally, we illustrate how individuals, human or otherwise, integrate within a collective not by being genetically or algorithmically programmed, but by growing and adapting into the socio-cognitive niche they occupy. AI can likewise inhabit one or multiple such niches, facilitated by a Theory of Mind.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 155 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.
Builds on
22 of 155 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problemscited by 256
- 2017Cooperating with Machinescited by 39
- 2024A new sociology of humans and machinescited by 32
- 2019Theory of Minds: Understanding Behavior in Groups Through Inverse Planningcited by 30
- 2022The free energy principle made simpler but not too simplecited by 27
- 2023Human-AI Coevolutioncited by 27
- 2021Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere (TAME): an experimentally-grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and mindscited by 25
- 2022Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principlescited by 23
- 2022Collective Intelligence in Human-AI Teams: A Bayesian Theory of Mind Approachcited by 16
10 more
- 2014JIDT: An information-theoretic toolkit for studying the dynamics of complex systemscited by 11
- 2024AI-enhanced Collective Intelligencecited by 10
- 2023A Review on Machine Theory of Mindcited by 9
- 2018Measuring Integrated Information: Comparison of Candidate Measures in Theory and Simulationcited by 6
- 2021Integrated information as a common signature of dynamical and information-processing complexitycited by 5
- 2024Factorised Active Inference for Strategic Multi-Agent Interactionscited by 4
- 2017The Morphospace of Consciousnesscited by 2
- 2018The morphospace of language networkscited by 2
- 2024Biological arrow of time: Emergence of tangled information hierarchies and self-modelling dynamicscited by 2
- 2017Comparing Information-Theoretic Measures of Complexity in Boltzmann Machinescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.