Heuristical Comparison of Vision Transformers Against Convolutional Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation on Remote Sensing Imagery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Transformers (ViT) have recently brought a new wave of research in the field of computer vision. These models have performed particularly well in image classification and segmentation. Research on semantic and instance segmentation has accelerated with the introduction of the new architecture, with over 80% of the top 20 benchmarks for the iSAID dataset based on either the ViT architecture or the attention mechanism behind its success. This paper focuses on the heuristic comparison of three key factors of using (or not using) ViT for semantic segmentation of remote sensing aerial images on the iSAID dataset. The experimental results observed during this research were analyzed based on three objectives. First, we studied the use of a weighted fused loss function to maximize the mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) score and Dice score while minimizing entropy or class representation loss. Second, we compared transfer learning on Meta's MaskFormer, a ViT-based semantic segmentation model, against a generic UNet Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based on mIoU, Dice scores, training efficiency, and inference time. Third, we examined the trade-offs between the two models in comparison to current state-of-the-art segmentation models. We show that the novel combined weighted loss function significantly boosts the CNN model's performance compared to transfer learning with ViT. The code for this implementation can be found at: https://github.com/ashimdahal/ViT-vs-CNN-Image-Segmentation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
- 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
- 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 622
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
13 more
- 2015Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 365
- 2018Context Encoding for Semantic Segmentationcited by 289
- 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 260
- 2022SegNeXt: Rethinking Convolutional Attention Design for Semantic Segmentationcited by 252
- 2022Visual Attention Networkcited by 210
- 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
- 2019MultiResUNet : Rethinking the U-Net Architecture for Multimodal Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 195
- 2019iSAID: A Large-scale Dataset for Instance Segmentation in Aerial Imagescited by 195
- 2022Advancing Plain Vision Transformer Towards Remote Sensing Foundation Modelcited by 149
- 2019IoU Loss for 2D/3D Object Detectioncited by 128
- 2022ViTAEv2: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Inductive Bias for Image Recognition and Beyondcited by 117
- 2021Is Attention Better Than Matrix Decomposition?cited by 75
- 2023AerialFormer: Multi-resolution Transformer for Aerial Image Segmentationcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.