Confidence-aware Denoised Fine-tuning of Off-the-shelf Models for Certified Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The remarkable advances in deep learning have led to the emergence of many off-the-shelf classifiers, e.g., large pre-trained models. However, since they are typically trained on clean data, they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Despite this vulnerability, their superior performance and transferability make off-the-shelf classifiers still valuable in practice, demanding further work to provide adversarial robustness for them in a post-hoc manner. A recently proposed method, denoised smoothing, leverages a denoiser model in front of the classifier to obtain provable robustness without additional training. However, the denoiser often creates hallucination, i.e., images that have lost the semantics of their originally assigned class, leading to a drop in robustness. Furthermore, its noise-and-denoise procedure introduces a significant distribution shift from the original distribution, causing the denoised smoothing framework to achieve sub-optimal robustness. In this paper, we introduce Fine-Tuning with Confidence-Aware Denoised Image Selection (FT-CADIS), a novel fine-tuning scheme to enhance the certified robustness of off-the-shelf classifiers. FT-CADIS is inspired by the observation that the confidence of off-the-shelf classifiers can effectively identify hallucinated images during denoised smoothing. Based on this, we develop a confidence-aware training objective to handle such hallucinated images and improve the stability of fine-tuning from denoised images. In this way, the classifier can be fine-tuned using only images that are beneficial for adversarial robustness. We also find that such a fine-tuning can be done by updating a small fraction of parameters of the classifier. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FT-CADIS has established the state-of-the-art certified robustness among denoised smoothing methods across all ℓ2-adversary radius in various benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2024.
Builds on
43 of 52 references.
References · 43
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
31 more
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 335
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
- 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
- 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2020Consistency Regularization for Certified Robustness of Smoothed Classifierscited by 73
- 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
- 2021SmoothMix: Training Confidence-calibrated Smoothed Classifiers for Certified Robustnesscited by 49
- 2021Boosting Randomized Smoothing with Variance Reduced Classifierscited by 47
- 2021On the Certified Robustness for Ensemble Models and Beyondcited by 40
- 2022Robust and Accurate -- Compositional Architectures for Randomized Smoothingcited by 12
- 2018MixTrain: Scalable Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2022Confidence-aware Training of Smoothed Classifiers for Certified Robustnesscited by 9
- 2023Multi-scale Diffusion Denoised Smoothingcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.