mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact, Tractable Gauss-Newton Optimization in Deep Reversible Architectures Reveal Poor Generalization

arXiv 2411.07979 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Second-order optimization has been shown to accelerate the training of deep neural networks in many applications, often yielding faster progress per iteration on the training loss compared to first-order optimizers. However, the generalization properties of second-order methods are still being debated. Theoretical investigations have proved difficult to carry out outside the tractable settings of heavily simplified model classes -- thus, the relevance of existing theories to practical deep learning applications remains unclear. Similarly, empirical studies in large-scale models and real datasets are significantly confounded by the necessity to approximate second-order updates in practice. It is often unclear whether the observed generalization behaviour arises specifically from the second-order nature of the parameter updates, or instead reflects the specific structured (e.g. Kronecker) approximations used or any damping-based interpolation towards first-order updates. Here, we show for the first time that exact Gauss-Newton (GN) updates take on a tractable form in a class of deep reversible architectures that are sufficiently expressive to be meaningfully applied to common benchmark datasets. We exploit this novel setting to study the training and generalization properties of the GN optimizer. We find that exact GN generalizes poorly. In the mini-batch training setting, this manifests as rapidly saturating progress even on the training loss, with parameter updates found to overfit each mini-batchatch without producing the features that would support generalization to other mini-batches. We show that our experiments run in the ``lazy'' regime, in which the neural tangent kernel (NTK) changes very little during the course of training. This behaviour is associated with having no significant changes in neural representations, explaining the lack of generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

2 of 67 references.

References · 2

  1. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
  2. 2021Depth Without the Magic: Inductive Bias of Natural Gradient Descentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.