mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Fundamental Accuracy--Robustness Trade-off in Regression and Classification

arXiv 2411.05853 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2024stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We derive a fundamental trade-off between standard and adversarial risk in a rather general situation that formalizes the following simple intuition: "If no (nearly) optimal predictor is smooth, adversarial robustness comes at the cost of accuracy." As a concrete example, we evaluate the derived trade-off in regression with polynomial ridge functions under mild regularity conditions. Generalizing our analysis of this example, we formulate a necessary condition under which adversarial robustness can be achieved without significant degradation of the accuracy. This necessary condition is expressed in terms of a quantity that resembles the Poincar'e constant of the data distribution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.

Builds on

7 of 11 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  2. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  3. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  4. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 151
  5. 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 77
  6. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  7. 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 50

Built on by

Not cited yet.