A Fundamental Accuracy--Robustness Trade-off in Regression and Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We derive a fundamental trade-off between standard and adversarial risk in a rather general situation that formalizes the following simple intuition: "If no (nearly) optimal predictor is smooth, adversarial robustness comes at the cost of accuracy." As a concrete example, we evaluate the derived trade-off in regression with polynomial ridge functions under mild regularity conditions. Generalizing our analysis of this example, we formulate a necessary condition under which adversarial robustness can be achieved without significant degradation of the accuracy. This necessary condition is expressed in terms of a quantity that resembles the Poincar'e constant of the data distribution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
7 of 11 references.
References · 7
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 151
- 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 77
- 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
- 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 50
Built on by
Not cited yet.