mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Image2Text2Image: A Novel Framework for Label-Free Evaluation of Image-to-Text Generation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

arXiv 2411.05706 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the quality of automatically generated image descriptions is a complex task that requires metrics capturing various dimensions, such as grammaticality, coverage, accuracy, and truthfulness. Although human evaluation provides valuable insights, its cost and time-consuming nature pose limitations. Existing automated metrics like BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, and CIDEr attempt to fill this gap, but they often exhibit weak correlations with human judgment. To address this challenge, we propose a novel evaluation framework called Image2Text2Image, which leverages diffusion models, such as Stable Diffusion or DALL-E, for text-to-image generation. In the Image2Text2Image framework, an input image is first processed by a selected image captioning model, chosen for evaluation, to generate a textual description. Using this generated description, a diffusion model then creates a new image. By comparing features extracted from the original and generated images, we measure their similarity using a designated similarity metric. A high similarity score suggests that the model has produced a faithful textual description, while a low score highlights discrepancies, revealing potential weaknesses in the model's performance. Notably, our framework does not rely on human-annotated reference captions, making it a valuable tool for assessing image captioning models. Extensive experiments and human evaluations validate the efficacy of our proposed Image2Text2Image evaluation framework. The code and dataset will be published to support further research in the community.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 18 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2024.

Builds on

18 of 64 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  6. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  7. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  8. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
  9. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  10. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
  11. 2017On the Automatic Generation of Medical Imaging Reportscited by 216
  12. 2021ViT-V-Net: Vision Transformer for Unsupervised Volumetric Medical Image Registrationcited by 87
6 more
  1. 2017Relevance of Unsupervised Metrics in Task-Oriented Dialogue for Evaluating Natural Language Generationcited by 61
  2. 2019TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluationcited by 58
  3. 2023CLAIR: Evaluating Image Captions with Large Language Modelscited by 43
  4. 2020NUBIA: NeUral Based Interchangeability Assessor for Text Generationcited by 34
  5. 2017VQABQ: Visual Question Answering by Basic Questionscited by 17
  6. 2024Towards Fine-Grained Citation Evaluation in Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis of Faithfulness Metricscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Image Regeneration: Evaluating Text-to-Image Model via Generating Identical Image with Multimodal Large Language Models
  2. 2023A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Principled Recaptioning Improves Image Generation
  3. 2022Human Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models on a Multi-Task Benchmark
  4. 2025UniGenBench++: A Unified Semantic Evaluation Benchmark for Text-to-Image Generation
  5. 2025Multimodal Language Models as Text-to-Image Model Evaluators
  6. 2025Why Settle for One? Text-to-ImageSet Generation and Evaluation
  7. 2025Evaluating the Evaluators: Metrics for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation
  8. 2025M3T2IBench: A Large-Scale Multi-Category, Multi-Instance, Multi-Relation Text-to-Image Benchmark