mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Analysis of Values, Agendas, and Observations in Corpora and LLMs

arXiv 2411.05040 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) generate diverse, situated, persuasive texts from a plurality of potential perspectives, influenced heavily by their prompts and training data. As part of LLM adoption, we seek to characterize - and ideally, manage - the socio-cultural values that they express, for reasons of safety, accuracy, inclusion, and cultural fidelity. We present a validated approach to automatically (1) extracting heterogeneous latent value propositions from texts, (2) assessing resonance and conflict of values with texts, and (3) combining these operations to characterize the pluralistic value alignment of human-sourced and LLM-sourced textual data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.

Builds on

7 of 16 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  3. 2022Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographicscited by 112
  4. 2022The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3cited by 105
  5. 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 97
  6. 2023Assessing LLMs for Moral Value Pluralismcited by 34
  7. 2024Annotator in the Loop: A Case Study of In-Depth Rater Engagement to Create a Bridging Benchmark Datasetcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.