Policy Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the challenge of AI value alignment with multiple individuals that have different reward functions and optimal policies in an underlying Markov decision process. We formalize this problem as one of policy aggregation, where the goal is to identify a desirable collective policy. We argue that an approach informed by social choice theory is especially suitable. Our key insight is that social choice methods can be reinterpreted by identifying ordinal preferences with volumes of subsets of the state-action occupancy polytope. Building on this insight, we demonstrate that a variety of methods--including approval voting, Borda count, the proportional veto core, and quantile fairness--can be practically applied to policy aggregation.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
- 2024A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 144
- 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedbackcited by 100
- 2021Reward is enough for convex MDPscited by 84
- 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
- 2024Provable Pluralistic Alignment: Multi-Party RLHF under Offline Human Feedbackcited by 32
- 2022Welfare and Fairness in Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2022Socially Fair Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2023Remembering to Be Fair: Non-Markovian Fairness in Sequential Decision Makingcited by 8
2 more
- 2023Fair Division via Quantile Sharescited by 3
- 2020Computing the proportional veto corecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 19
- 2025Game Theory Meets Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey with Taxonomy and New Frontierscited by 16
- 2025Navigating the Social Welfare Frontier: Portfolios for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2025Strategyproof Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 5
- 2024Being Considerate as a Pathway Towards Pluralistic Alignment for Agentic AIcited by 2
- 2026Adaptive Pluralistic Alignment: A pipeline for dynamic artificial democracycited by 2
- 2026Back to Blackwell: Closing the Loop on Intransitivity in Multi-Objective Preference Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Toolscited by 0
- 2026When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools11 May 2026
- 2026Adaptive Pluralistic Alignment: A pipeline for dynamic artificial democracy2 May 2026
- 2026Back to Blackwell: Closing the Loop on Intransitivity in Multi-Objective Preference Fine-Tuning22 Feb 2026
- 2025Strategyproof Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Mar 2025
- 2025Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences22 Feb 2025
- 2025Navigating the Social Welfare Frontier: Portfolios for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning13 Feb 2025
- 2025Game Theory Meets Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey with Taxonomy and New Frontiers13 Feb 2025
- 2024Being Considerate as a Pathway Towards Pluralistic Alignment for Agentic AI15 Nov 2024