Open-Source High-Speed Flight Surrogate Modeling Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-speed flight vehicles, which travel much faster than the speed of sound, are crucial for national defense and space exploration. However, accurately predicting their behavior under numerous, varied flight conditions is a challenge and often prohibitively expensive. The proposed approach involves creating smarter, more efficient machine learning models (also known as surrogate models or meta models) that can fuse data generated from a variety of fidelity levels -- to include engineering methods, simulation, wind tunnel, and flight test data -- to make more accurate predictions. These models are able to move the bulk of the computation from high performance computing (HPC) to single user machines (laptop, desktop, etc.). The project builds upon previous work but introduces code improvements and an informed perspective on the direction of the field. The new surrogate modeling framework is now modular and, by design, broadly applicable to many modeling problems. The new framework also has a more robust automatic hyperparameter tuning capability and abstracts away most of the pre- and post-processing tasks. The Gaussian process regression and deep neural network-based models included in the presented framework were able to model two datasets with high accuracy (R^2>0.99). The primary conclusion is that the framework is effective and has been delivered to the Air Force for integration into real-world projects. For future work, significant and immediate investment in continued research is crucial. The author recommends further testing and refining modeling methods that explicitly incorporate physical laws and are robust enough to handle simulation and test data from varying resolutions and sources, including coarse meshes, fine meshes, unstructured meshes, and limited experimental test points.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
16 of 80 references.
References · 16
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 221
- 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 113
- 2016Inferring solutions of differential equations using noisy multi-fidelity datacited by 38
- 2021Multi-fidelity regression using artificial neural networks: efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantitiescited by 31
- 2023SMT 2.0: A Surrogate Modeling Toolbox with a focus on Hierarchical and Mixed Variables Gaussian Processescited by 29
4 more
- 2019Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian Processescited by 25
- 2021Physics-enhanced deep surrogates for partial differential equationscited by 18
- 2017Gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional problemscited by 15
- 2023Intelligent sampling for surrogate modeling, hyperparameter optimization, and data analysiscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.