Unleashing the power of novel conditional generative approaches for new materials discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For a very long time, computational approaches to the design of new materials have relied on an iterative process of finding a candidate material and modeling its properties. AI has played a crucial role in this regard, helping to accelerate the discovery and optimization of crystal properties and structures through advanced computational methodologies and data-driven approaches. To address the problem of new materials design and fasten the process of new materials search, we have applied latest generative approaches to the problem of crystal structure design, trying to solve the inverse problem: by given properties generate a structure that satisfies them without utilizing supercomputer powers. In our work we propose two approaches: 1) conditional structure modification: optimization of the stability of an arbitrary atomic configuration, using the energy difference between the most energetically favorable structure and all its less stable polymorphs and 2) conditional structure generation. We used a representation for materials that includes the following information: lattice, atom coordinates, atom types, chemical features, space group and formation energy of the structure. The loss function was optimized to take into account the periodic boundary conditions of crystal structures. We have applied Diffusion models approach, Flow matching, usual Autoencoder (AE) and compared the results of the models and approaches. As a metric for the study, physical PyMatGen matcher was employed: we compare target structure with generated one using default tolerances. So far, our modifier and generator produce structures with needed properties with accuracy 41% and 82% respectively. To prove the offered methodology efficiency, inference have been carried out, resulting in several potentially new structures with formation energy below the AFLOW-derived convex hulls.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2024.
Builds on
11 of 22 references.
References · 11
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
- 2023MatterGen: a generative model for inorganic materials designcited by 98
- 2023A Hitchhiker's Guide to Geometric GNNs for 3D Atomic Systemscited by 68
- 2020An invertible crystallographic representation for general inverse design of inorganic crystals with targeted propertiescited by 53
- 2022Physics Guided Deep Learning for Generative Design of Crystal Materials with Symmetry Constraintscited by 30
- 2023Diffusion probabilistic models enhance variational autoencoder for crystal structure generative modelingcited by 17
- 2022Boosting Heterogeneous Catalyst Discovery by Structurally Constrained Deep Learning Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design
- 2024Generative Inverse Design of Crystal Structures via Diffusion Models with Transformers
- 2025Establishing baselines for generative discovery of inorganic crystals
- 2025Introducing physics-informed generative models for targeting structural novelty in the exploration of chemical space
- 2026Reinforcement Learning on the Discrete Composition Channel of a Crystal Generator: Validated Gains and Reward Hacking
- 2026Chemical filters for ultra-high-throughput materials screening and generation
- 2025Guiding Generative Models to Uncover Diverse and Novel Crystals via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Composable Crystals: Controllable Materials Discovery via Concept Learning