Lost in Context: The Influence of Context on Feature Attribution Methods for Object Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contextual information plays a critical role in object recognition models within computer vision, where changes in context can significantly affect accuracy, underscoring models' dependence on contextual cues. This study investigates how context manipulation influences both model accuracy and feature attribution, providing insights into the reliance of object recognition models on contextual information as understood through the lens of feature attribution methods. We employ a range of feature attribution techniques to decipher the reliance of deep neural networks on context in object recognition tasks. Using the ImageNet-9 and our curated ImageNet-CS datasets, we conduct experiments to evaluate the impact of contextual variations, analyzed through feature attribution methods. Our findings reveal several key insights: (a) Correctly classified images predominantly emphasize object volume attribution over context volume attribution. (b) The dependence on context remains relatively stable across different context modifications, irrespective of classification accuracy. (c) Context change exerts a more pronounced effect on model performance than Context perturbations. (d) Surprisingly, context attribution in `no-information' scenarios is non-trivial. Our research moves beyond traditional methods by assessing the implications of broad-level modifications on object recognition, either in the object or its context.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2024.
Builds on
27 of 55 references.
References · 27
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
15 more
- 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
- 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 391
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
- 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 191
- 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 147
- 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
- 2016Object Recognition with and without Objectscited by 39
- 2022Explainable Deep Learning Methods in Medical Image Classification: A Surveycited by 32
- 2023What do neural networks learn in image classification? A frequency shortcut perspectivecited by 28
- 2023Context Understanding in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 23
- 2021Scrutinizing XAI using linear ground-truth data with suppressor variablescited by 18
- 2016The Role of Context Selection in Object Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.