mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TODO: Enhancing LLM Alignment with Ternary Preferences

arXiv 2411.02442 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human intent is critical for enhancing their performance across a variety of tasks. Standard alignment techniques, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), often rely on the binary Bradley-Terry (BT) model, which can struggle to capture the complexities of human preferences -- particularly in the presence of noisy or inconsistent labels and frequent ties. To address these limitations, we introduce the Tie-rank Oriented Bradley-Terry model (TOBT), an extension of the BT model that explicitly incorporates ties, enabling more nuanced preference representation. Building on this, we propose Tie-rank Oriented Direct Preference Optimization (TODO), a novel alignment algorithm that leverages TOBT's ternary ranking system to improve preference alignment. In evaluations on Mistral-7B and Llama 3-8B models, TODO consistently outperforms DPO in modeling preferences across both in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets. Additional assessments using MT Bench and benchmarks such as Piqa, ARC-c, and MMLU further demonstrate TODO's superior alignment performance. Notably, TODO also shows strong results in binary preference alignment, highlighting its versatility and potential for broader integration into LLM alignment. The implementation details can be found in https://github.com/XXares/TODO.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2024.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement31 May
  2. 2024Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks23 Apr
  3. 2024Scaling Data Diversity for Fine-Tuning Language Models in Human Alignment17 Mar
  4. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  5. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset16 Feb
  6. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct

Other references · 15

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  9. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  10. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  11. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  12. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
3 more
  1. 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 342
  2. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 244
  3. 2023Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignmentcited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ComPO: Preference Alignment via Comparison Oracles
  2. 2025Data Selection for LLM Alignment Using Fine-Grained Preferences
  3. 2026A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment
  4. 2025Robust LLM Alignment via Distributionally Robust Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
  6. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
  7. 2025Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With Ranked Choice Modeling
  8. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs