mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generating the Traces You Need: A Conditional Generative Model for Process Mining Data

arXiv 2411.02131 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.DB cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, trace generation has emerged as a significant challenge within the Process Mining community. Deep Learning (DL) models have demonstrated accuracy in reproducing the features of the selected processes. However, current DL generative models are limited in their ability to adapt the learned distributions to generate data samples based on specific conditions or attributes. This limitation is particularly significant because the ability to control the type of generated data can be beneficial in various contexts, enabling a focus on specific behaviours, exploration of infrequent patterns, or simulation of alternative 'what-if' scenarios. In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a conditional model for process data generation based on a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE). Conditional models offer control over the generation process by tuning input conditional variables, enabling more targeted and controlled data generation. Unlike other domains, CVAE for process mining faces specific challenges due to the multiperspective nature of the data and the need to adhere to control-flow rules while ensuring data variability. Specifically, we focus on generating process executions conditioned on control flow and temporal features of the trace, allowing us to produce traces for specific, identified sub-processes. The generated traces are then evaluated using common metrics for generative model assessment, along with additional metrics to evaluate the quality of the conditional generation

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

10 of 32 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  2. 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 612
  3. 2019Cyclical Annealing Schedule: A Simple Approach to Mitigating KL Vanishingcited by 191
  4. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  5. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 60
  6. 2020Predictive Business Process Monitoring via Generative Adversarial Nets: The Case of Next Event Predictioncited by 31
  7. 2019Automated Discovery of Business Process Simulation Models from Event Logscited by 17
  8. 2018An Interdisciplinary Comparison of Sequence Modeling Methods for Next-Element Predictioncited by 14
  9. 2020Discovering Generative Models from Event Logs: Data-driven Simulation vs Deep Learningcited by 8
  10. 2023Can I Trust My Simulation Model? Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.