Achieving Domain-Independent Certified Robustness via Knowledge Continuity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present knowledge continuity, a novel definition inspired by Lipschitz continuity which aims to certify the robustness of neural networks across input domains (such as continuous and discrete domains in vision and language, respectively). Most existing approaches that seek to certify robustness, especially Lipschitz continuity, lie within the continuous domain with norm and distribution-dependent guarantees. In contrast, our proposed definition yields certification guarantees that depend only on the loss function and the intermediate learned metric spaces of the neural network. These bounds are independent of domain modality, norms, and distribution. We further demonstrate that the expressiveness of a model class is not at odds with its knowledge continuity. This implies that achieving robustness by maximizing knowledge continuity should not theoretically hinder inferential performance. Finally, to complement our theoretical results, we present several applications of knowledge continuity such as regularization, a certification algorithm, and show that knowledge continuity can be used to localize vulnerable components of a neural network.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.
Builds on
73 of 88 references.
References · 73
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
38 more
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
- 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
- 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 305
- 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 204
- 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 193
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 182
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
- 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 171
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 164
- 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.