mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Few-Class Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Selection of Vision Models and Dataset Difficulty Measurement

arXiv 2411.01099 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Few-Class Arena (FCA), as a unified benchmark with focus on testing efficient image classification models for few classes. A wide variety of benchmark datasets with many classes (80-1000) have been created to assist Computer Vision architectural evolution. An increasing number of vision models are evaluated with these many-class datasets. However, real-world applications often involve substantially fewer classes of interest (2-10). This gap between many and few classes makes it difficult to predict performance of the few-class applications using models trained on the available many-class datasets. To date, little has been offered to evaluate models in this Few-Class Regime. We conduct a systematic evaluation of the ResNet family trained on ImageNet subsets from 2 to 1000 classes, and test a wide spectrum of Convolutional Neural Networks and Transformer architectures over ten datasets by using our newly proposed FCA tool. Furthermore, to aid an up-front assessment of dataset difficulty and a more efficient selection of models, we incorporate a difficulty measure as a function of class similarity. FCA offers a new tool for efficient machine learning in the Few-Class Regime, with goals ranging from a new efficient class similarity proposal, to lightweight model architecture design, to a new scaling law. FCA is user-friendly and can be easily extended to new models and datasets, facilitating future research work. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/bryanbocao/fca.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2024.

Builds on

66 of 100 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  8. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  11. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  12. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
38 more
  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  4. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  5. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  6. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  7. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  9. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  10. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  11. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  12. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  13. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  14. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
  15. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  16. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  17. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
  18. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  19. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
  20. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 703
  21. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  22. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 636
  23. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  24. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
  25. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  26. 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
  27. 2023OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documentscited by 316
  28. 2017A Neural Representation of Sketch Drawingscited by 311
  29. 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
  30. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  31. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
  32. 2022EfficientFormer: Vision Transformers at MobileNet Speedcited by 240
  33. 2014Learning Fine-grained Image Similarity with Deep Rankingcited by 189
  34. 2021Conformer: Local Features Coupling Global Representations for Visual Recognitioncited by 164
  35. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Few-shot Learning: Evolution, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 162
  36. 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
  37. 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
  38. 2022Pushing the Limits of Simple Pipelines for Few-Shot Learning: External Data and Fine-Tuning Make a Differencecited by 123

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.