MetaMetrics-MT: Tuning Meta-Metrics for Machine Translation via Human Preference Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present MetaMetrics-MT, an innovative metric designed to evaluate machine translation (MT) tasks by aligning closely with human preferences through Bayesian optimization with Gaussian Processes. MetaMetrics-MT enhances existing MT metrics by optimizing their correlation with human judgments. Our experiments on the WMT24 metric shared task dataset demonstrate that MetaMetrics-MT outperforms all existing baselines, setting a new benchmark for state-of-the-art performance in the reference-based setting. Furthermore, it achieves comparable results to leading metrics in the reference-free setting, offering greater efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.
Builds on
14 of 23 references.
References · 14
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
- 2020Rethinking embedding coupling in pre-trained language modelscited by 103
- 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
- 2021Larger-Scale Transformers for Multilingual Masked Language Modelingcited by 87
- 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 74
- 2024Improving Statistical Significance in Human Evaluation of Automatic Metrics via Soft Pairwise Accuracycited by 25
- 2024Preference Tuning with Human Feedback on Language, Speech, and Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progresscited by 10
- 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025Reward Models are Metrics in a Trench Coatcited by 2
- 2025Adaptive Originality Filtering: Rejection Based Prompting and RiddleScore for Culturally Grounded Multilingual Riddle Generationcited by 1
- 2025Simple and Effective Baselines for Code Summarisation Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Meta-Metrics: Source-Sentence Conditioned Weighting for MT Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Meta-Metrics: Source-Sentence Conditioned Weighting for MT Evaluation9 May 2026
- 2025Reward Models are Metrics in a Trench Coat3 Oct 2025
- 2025Adaptive Originality Filtering: Rejection Based Prompting and RiddleScore for Culturally Grounded Multilingual Riddle Generation26 Aug 2025
- 2025Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progress24 Jun 2025
- 2025Simple and Effective Baselines for Code Summarisation Evaluation26 May 2025
- 2025Adding Chocolate to Mint: Mitigating Metric Interference in Machine Translation11 Mar 2025