mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Simple Remedy for Dataset Bias via Self-Influence: A Mislabeled Sample Perspective

arXiv 2411.00360 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning generalized models from biased data is an important undertaking toward fairness in deep learning. To address this issue, recent studies attempt to identify and leverage bias-conflicting samples free from spurious correlations without prior knowledge of bias or an unbiased set. However, spurious correlation remains an ongoing challenge, primarily due to the difficulty in precisely detecting these samples. In this paper, inspired by the similarities between mislabeled samples and bias-conflicting samples, we approach this challenge from a novel perspective of mislabeled sample detection. Specifically, we delve into Influence Function, one of the standard methods for mislabeled sample detection, for identifying bias-conflicting samples and propose a simple yet effective remedy for biased models by leveraging them. Through comprehensive analysis and experiments on diverse datasets, we demonstrate that our new perspective can boost the precision of detection and rectify biased models effectively. Furthermore, our approach is complementary to existing methods, showing performance improvement even when applied to models that have already undergone recent debiasing techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.

Builds on

45 of 60 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  6. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  11. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  12. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
33 more
  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  5. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  6. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  7. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  10. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
  11. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  12. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  13. 2020Transformer Transducer: A Streamable Speech Recognition Model with Transformer Encoders and RNN-T Losscited by 235
  14. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  15. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  16. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 133
  17. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
  18. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  19. 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 115
  20. 2021Causal Attention for Unbiased Visual Recognitioncited by 80
  21. 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
  22. 2022Learning Debiased Classifier with Biased Committeecited by 51
  23. 2021Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributescited by 44
  24. 2016Object Recognition with and without Objectscited by 39
  25. 2022Avoiding spurious correlations via logit correctioncited by 32
  26. 2019Less Is Better: Unweighted Data Subsampling via Influence Functioncited by 30
  27. 2022SelecMix: Debiased Learning by Contradicting-pair Samplingcited by 29
  28. 2021Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updatescited by 27
  29. 2018Data Dropout: Optimizing Training Data for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 23
  30. 2022Mitigating Dataset Bias by Using Per-sample Gradientcited by 22
  31. 2022Training Debiased Subnetworks with Contrastive Weight Pruningcited by 16
  32. 2021Fighting Fire with Fire: Contrastive Debiasing without Bias-free Data via Generative Bias-transformationcited by 9
  33. 2024PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial Consistencycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.