mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Large Language Models for Patient Comments Multi-Label Classification

arXiv 2410.23528 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Patient experience and care quality are crucial for a hospital's sustainability and reputation. The analysis of patient feedback offers valuable insight into patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, the unstructured nature of these comments poses challenges for traditional machine learning methods following a supervised learning paradigm. This is due to the unavailability of labeled data and the nuances these texts encompass. This research explores leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) in conducting Multi-label Text Classification (MLTC) of inpatient comments shared after a stay in the hospital. GPT-4 Turbo was leveraged to conduct the classification. However, given the sensitive nature of patients' comments, a security layer is introduced before feeding the data to the LLM through a Protected Health Information (PHI) detection framework, which ensures patients' de-identification. Additionally, using the prompt engineering framework, zero-shot learning, in-context learning, and chain-of-thought prompting were experimented with. Results demonstrate that GPT-4 Turbo, whether following a zero-shot or few-shot setting, outperforms traditional methods and Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and achieves the highest overall performance with an F1-score of 76.12% and a weighted F1-score of 73.61% followed closely by the few-shot learning results. Subsequently, the results' association with other patient experience structured variables (e.g., rating) was conducted. The study enhances MLTC through the application of LLMs, offering healthcare practitioners an efficient method to gain deeper insights into patient feedback and deliver prompt, appropriate responses.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.

Builds on

1 of 19 references.

References · 1

  1. 2023Weakly Supervised Text Classification on Free Text Comments in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Benchmarking Open-Source Large Language Models on Healthcare Text Classification Tasks
  2. 2023The Potential and Pitfalls of using a Large Language Model such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 as a Clinical Assistant
  3. 2026A primer on evaluation methods for large language models in healthcare
  4. 2024Large Language Model Capabilities in Perioperative Risk Prediction and Prognostication
  5. 2025BRIDGE: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Understanding Real-world Clinical Practice Text
  6. 2025KDH-MLTC: Knowledge Distillation for Healthcare Multi-Label Text Classification
  7. 2023ClinicalGPT: Large Language Models Finetuned with Diverse Medical Data and Comprehensive Evaluation
  8. 2025Exploring Large Language Models in Healthcare: Insights into Corpora Sources, Customization Strategies, and Evaluation Metrics