Why Fine-grained Labels in Pretraining Benefit Generalization?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies show that pretraining a deep neural network with fine-grained labeled data, followed by fine-tuning on coarse-labeled data for downstream tasks, often yields better generalization than pretraining with coarse-labeled data. While there is ample empirical evidence supporting this, the theoretical justification remains an open problem. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a "hierarchical multi-view" structure to confine the input data distribution. Under this framework, we prove that: 1) coarse-grained pretraining only allows a neural network to learn the common features well, while 2) fine-grained pretraining helps the network learn the rare features in addition to the common ones, leading to improved accuracy on hard downstream test samples.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Perch 2.0: The Bittern Lesson for Bioacousticscited by 25
- 2025Perch 2.0 transfers 'whale' to underwater taskscited by 7
- 2025The Advantage of Fine-Grained Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Perch 2.0 transfers 'whale' to underwater tasks2 Dec 2025
- 2025The Advantage of Fine-Grained Training5 Sep 2025
- 2025Perch 2.0: The Bittern Lesson for Bioacoustics6 Aug 2025