mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decoupling Semantic Similarity from Spatial Alignment for Neural Networks

arXiv 2410.23107 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What representation do deep neural networks learn? How similar are images to each other for neural networks? Despite the overwhelming success of deep learning methods key questions about their internal workings still remain largely unanswered, due to their internal high dimensionality and complexity. To address this, one approach is to measure the similarity of activation responses to various inputs. Representational Similarity Matrices (RSMs) distill this similarity into scalar values for each input pair. These matrices encapsulate the entire similarity structure of a system, indicating which input leads to similar responses. While the similarity between images is ambiguous, we argue that the spatial location of semantic objects does neither influence human perception nor deep learning classifiers. Thus this should be reflected in the definition of similarity between image responses for computer vision systems. Revisiting the established similarity calculations for RSMs we expose their sensitivity to spatial alignment. In this paper, we propose to solve this through semantic RSMs, which are invariant to spatial permutation. We measure semantic similarity between input responses by formulating it as a set-matching problem. Further, we quantify the superiority of semantic RSMs over spatio-semantic RSMs through image retrieval and by comparing the similarity between representations to the similarity between predicted class probabilities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  8. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  9. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  10. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 512
  11. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
  12. 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 334
9 more
  1. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
  2. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  3. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  4. 2020Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semanticscited by 161
  5. 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 143
  6. 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
  7. 2021Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representationscited by 112
  8. 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
  9. 2023EgoObjects: A Large-Scale Egocentric Dataset for Fine-Grained Object Understandingcited by 40

Built on by

Not cited yet.