GPT-4o reads the mind in the eyes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of reproducing human-like inferences, including inferences about emotions and mental states, from text. Whether this capability extends beyond text to other modalities remains unclear. Humans possess a sophisticated ability to read the mind in the eyes of other people. Here we tested whether this ability is also present in GPT-4o, a multimodal LLM. Using two versions of a widely used theory of mind test, the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test and the Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, we found that GPT-4o outperformed humans in interpreting mental states from upright faces but underperformed humans when faces were inverted. While humans in our sample showed no difference between White and Non-white faces, GPT-4o's accuracy was higher for White than for Non-white faces. GPT-4o's errors were not random but revealed a highly consistent, yet incorrect, processing of mental-state information across trials, with an orientation-dependent error structure that qualitatively differed from that of humans for inverted faces but not for upright faces. These findings highlight how advanced mental state inference abilities and human-like face processing signatures, such as inversion effects, coexist in GPT-4o alongside substantial differences in information processing compared to humans.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.
4 papers.
- 2025Agentic Large Language Models, a surveycited by 108
- 2025Do Chains-of-Thoughts of Large Language Models Suffer from Hallucinations, Cognitive Biases, or Phobias in Bayesian Reasoning?cited by 4
- 2025Towards properly implementing Theory of Mind in AI systems: An account of four misconceptionscited by 3
- 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaborationcited by 0
- 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration26 Jun 2025
- 2025Agentic Large Language Models, a survey29 Mar 2025
- 2025Do Chains-of-Thoughts of Large Language Models Suffer from Hallucinations, Cognitive Biases, or Phobias in Bayesian Reasoning?19 Mar 2025
- 2025Towards properly implementing Theory of Mind in AI systems: An account of four misconceptions28 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models
- 2023Mind meets machine: Unravelling GPT-4's cognitive psychology
- 2024GPT-4 Emulates Average-Human Emotional Cognition from a Third-Person Perspective
- 2025From Black Boxes to Transparent Minds: Evaluating and Enhancing the Theory of Mind in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks
- 2025OASST-ETC Dataset: Alignment Signals from Eye-tracking Analysis of LLM Responses
- 2026Video-Only ToM: Enhancing Theory of Mind in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Are Vision Language Models Cross-Cultural Theory of Mind Reasoners?