Explainability in AI Based Applications: A Framework for Comparing Different Techniques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of artificial intelligence into business processes has significantly enhanced decision-making capabilities across various industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. However, explaining the decisions made by these AI systems poses a significant challenge due to the opaque nature of recent deep learning models, which typically function as black boxes. To address this opacity, a multitude of explainability techniques have emerged. However, in practical business applications, the challenge lies in selecting an appropriate explainability method that balances comprehensibility with accuracy. This paper addresses the practical need of understanding differences in the output of explainability techniques by proposing a novel method for the assessment of the agreement of different explainability techniques. Based on our proposed methods, we provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of six leading explainability techniques to help guiding the selection of such techniques in practice. Our proposed general-purpose method is evaluated on top of one of the most popular deep learning architectures, the Vision Transformer model, which is frequently employed in business applications. Notably, we propose a novel metric to measure the agreement of explainability techniques that can be interpreted visually. By providing a practical framework for understanding the agreement of diverse explainability techniques, our research aims to facilitate the broader integration of interpretable AI systems in business applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
- 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
- 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 156
- 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
13 more
- 2017What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?cited by 127
- 2020Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiatedcited by 127
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2021Explainability of deep vision-based autonomous driving systems: Review and challengescited by 80
- 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
- 2021Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directionscited by 73
- 2023Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision supportcited by 65
- 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
- 2021Order in the Court: Explainable AI Methods Prone to Disagreementcited by 36
- 2024LeGrad: An Explainability Method for Vision Transformers via Feature Formation Sensitivitycited by 32
- 2024On the Faithfulness of Vision Transformer Explanationscited by 19
- 2017Learning Functional Causal Models with Generative Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2023Interpretability-Aware Vision Transformercited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.