mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rephrasing natural text data with different languages and quality levels for Large Language Model pre-training

arXiv 2410.20796 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently published work on rephrasing natural text data for pre-training LLMs has shown promising results when combining the original dataset with the synthetically rephrased data. We build upon previous work by replicating existing results on C4 and extending them with our optimized rephrasing pipeline to the English, German, Italian, and Spanish Oscar subsets of CulturaX. Our pipeline leads to increased performance on standard evaluation benchmarks in both the mono- and multilingual setup. In addition, we provide a detailed study of our pipeline, investigating the choice of the base dataset and LLM for the rephrasing, as well as the relationship between the model size and the performance after pre-training. By exploring data with different perceived quality levels, we show that gains decrease with higher quality. Furthermore, we find the difference in performance between model families to be bigger than between different model sizes. This highlights the necessity for detailed tests before choosing an LLM to rephrase large amounts of data. Moreover, we investigate the effect of pre-training with synthetic data on supervised fine-tuning. Here, we find increasing but inconclusive results that highly depend on the used benchmark. These results (again) highlight the need for better benchmarking setups. In summary, we show that rephrasing multilingual and low-quality data is a very promising direction to extend LLM pre-training data.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  6. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  8. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  9. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  10. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  11. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  12. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
12 more
  1. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  2. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
  3. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 475
  4. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
  5. 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 156
  6. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 143
  7. 2021Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 82
  8. 2018Sequence-to-Sequence Data Augmentation for Dialogue Language Understandingcited by 67
  9. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 52
  10. 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
  11. 2018Text Data Augmentation Made Simple By Leveraging NLP Cloud APIscited by 40
  12. 2024Improving Black-box Robustness with In-Context Rewritingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

8 papers.