TRADE: Transfer of Distributions between External Conditions with Normalizing Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modeling distributions that depend on external control parameters is a common scenario in diverse applications like molecular simulations, where system properties like temperature affect molecular configurations. Despite the relevance of these applications, existing solutions are unsatisfactory as they require severely restricted model architectures or rely on energy-based training, which is prone to instability. We introduce TRADE, which overcomes these limitations by formulating the learning process as a boundary value problem. By initially training the model for a specific condition using either i.i.d.~samples or backward KL training, we establish a boundary distribution. We then propagate this information across other conditions using the gradient of the unnormalized density with respect to the external parameter. This formulation, akin to the principles of physics-informed neural networks, allows us to efficiently learn parameter-dependent distributions without restrictive assumptions. Experimentally, we demonstrate that TRADE achieves excellent results in a wide range of applications, ranging from Bayesian inference and molecular simulations to physical lattice models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.
Builds on
22 of 58 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
- 2019Automatic Posterior Transformation for Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 219
- 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 156
- 2018i-RevNet: Deep Invertible Networkscited by 137
- 2020Disentanglement by Nonlinear ICA with General Incompressible-flow Networks (GIN)cited by 92
10 more
- 2020Targeted free energy estimation via learned mappingscited by 67
- 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
- 2020Advances in Black-Box VI: Normalizing Flows, Importance Weighting, and Optimizationcited by 37
- 2021Normalizing field flows: Solving forward and inverse stochastic differential equations using physics-informed flow modelscited by 35
- 2023Free-form Flows: Make Any Architecture a Normalizing Flowcited by 26
- 2023Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective Flowscited by 18
- 2022BR-SNIS: Bias Reduced Self-Normalized Importance Samplingcited by 12
- 2023Designing losses for data-free training of normalizing flows on Boltzmann distributionscited by 9
- 2024Physics-Informed Real NVP for Satellite Power System Fault Detectioncited by 4
- 2023PINF: Continuous Normalizing Flows for Physics-Constrained Deep Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.