Designing losses for data-free training of normalizing flows on Boltzmann distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generating a Boltzmann distribution in high dimension has recently been achieved with Normalizing Flows, which enable fast and exact computation of the generated density, and thus unbiased estimation of expectations. However, current implementations rely on accurate training data, which typically comes from computationally expensive simulations. There is therefore a clear incentive to train models with incomplete or no data by relying solely on the target density, which can be obtained from a physical energy model (up to a constant factor). For that purpose, we analyze the properties of standard losses based on Kullback-Leibler divergences. We showcase their limitations, in particular a strong propensity for mode collapse during optimization on high-dimensional distributions. We then propose strategies to alleviate these issues, most importantly a new loss function well-grounded in theory and with suitable optimization properties. Using as a benchmark the generation of 3D molecular configurations, we show on several tasks that, for the first time, imperfect pre-trained models can be further optimized in the absence of training data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2023.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 571
- 2020Stochastic Normalizing Flowscited by 157
- 2020VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inferencecited by 75
- 2017Continuously Differentiable Exponential Linear Unitscited by 73
- 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
- 2021Smooth Normalizing Flowscited by 53
- 2021Resampling Base Distributions of Normalizing Flowscited by 42
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensemblescited by 110
- 2024Dynamical Measure Transport and Neural PDE Solvers for Samplingcited by 20
- 2025Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generatorscited by 15
- 2024Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representationscited by 5
- 2024TRADE: Transfer of Distributions between External Conditions with Normalizing Flowscited by 3
- 2025Energy-Based Coarse-Graining in Molecular Dynamics: A Flow-Based Framework without Datacited by 2
- 2024Sequential transport maps using SoS density estimation and α-divergencescited by 1
- 2026Mode Coverage in Normalizing Flow Boltzmann Generators via Log-Ratio Variationcited by 0
- 2026Machine learning kinetics from molecular dynamics datacited by 0
- 2026Machine learning kinetics from molecular dynamics data15 Sep 2026
- 2026Mode Coverage in Normalizing Flow Boltzmann Generators via Log-Ratio Variation8 Sep 2026
- 2025Energy-Based Coarse-Graining in Molecular Dynamics: A Flow-Based Framework without Data29 Apr 2025
- 2025Temperature-Annealed Boltzmann Generators31 Jan 2025
- 2024TRADE: Transfer of Distributions between External Conditions with Normalizing Flows25 Oct 2024
- 2024Dynamical Measure Transport and Neural PDE Solvers for Sampling10 Jul 2024
- 2024Sequential transport maps using SoS density estimation and α-divergences27 Feb 2024
- 2024AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles7 Feb 2024
- 2024Conditional Normalizing Flows for Active Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Representations2 Feb 2024