mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Test of Time: Predicting the Sustainable Success of Online Collaboration in Wikipedia

arXiv 2410.19150 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2024cs.CY cs.CL cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Internet has significantly expanded the potential for global collaboration, allowing millions of users to contribute to collective projects like Wikipedia. While prior work has assessed the success of online collaborations, most approaches are time-agnostic, evaluating success without considering its longevity. Research on the factors that ensure the long-term preservation of high-quality standards in online collaboration is scarce. In this study, we address this gap. We propose a novel metric, `Sustainable Success,' which measures the ability of collaborative efforts to maintain their quality over time. Using Wikipedia as a case study, we introduce the SustainPedia dataset, which compiles data from over 40K Wikipedia articles, including each article's sustainable success label and more than 300 explanatory features such as edit history, user experience, and team composition. Using this dataset, we develop machine learning models to predict the sustainable success of Wikipedia articles. Our best-performing model achieves a high AU-ROC score of 0.88 on average. Our analysis reveals important insights. For example, we find that the longer an article takes to be recognized as high-quality, the more likely it is to maintain that status over time (i.e., be sustainable). Additionally, user experience emerged as the most critical predictor of sustainability. Our analysis provides insights into broader collective actions beyond Wikipedia (e.g., online activism, crowdsourced open-source software), where the same social dynamics that drive success on Wikipedia might play a role. We make all data and code used for this study publicly available for further research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 99 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  3. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  4. 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 106
  5. 2021Measuring Sentence-Level and Aspect-Level (Un)certainty in Science Communicationscited by 27
  6. 2023Don't lose the message while paraphrasing: A study on content preserving style transfercited by 25
  7. 2019A Joint Model for Multimodal Document Quality Assessmentcited by 7
  8. 2021On the Value of Wikipedia as a Gateway to the Webcited by 6
  9. 2024Language-Agnostic Modeling of Wikipedia Articles for Content Quality Assessment across Languagescited by 6
  10. 2014Coding Together at Scale: GitHub as a Collaborative Social Networkcited by 5
  11. 2019Are All Successful Communities Alike? Characterizing and Predicting the Success of Online Communitiescited by 5
  12. 2020NwQM: A neural quality assessment framework for Wikipediacited by 3
9 more
  1. 2021Quality change: norm or exception? Measurement, Analysis and Detection of Quality Change in Wikipediacited by 3
  2. 2016Social Networks Under Stresscited by 2
  3. 2018Tracing Community Genealogy: How New Communities Emerge from the Oldcited by 2
  4. 2023With Flying Colors: Predicting Community Success in Large-scale Collaborative Campaignscited by 2
  5. 2023Automatic Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles -- A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 2
  6. 2015Coordination and Efficiency in Decentralized Collaborationcited by 1
  7. 2018Network Structure, Efficiency, and Performance in WikiProjectscited by 1
  8. 2020Analyzing the Productivity of GitHub Teams based on Formation Phase Activitycited by 1
  9. 2023Protection from Evil and Good: The Differential Effects of Page Protection on Wikipedia Article Qualitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.