mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning

arXiv 2410.19000 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Zero-shot reasoning methods with Large Language Models (LLMs) offer significant advantages including great generalization to novel tasks and reduced dependency on human-crafted examples. However, the current zero-shot methods still have limitations in complex tasks, e.g., answering questions that require multi-step reasoning. In this paper, we address this limitation by introducing a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help LLMs better understand the question and guide the problem-solving process of LLMs. We first demonstrate how the existing reasoning strategies, Chain-of-Thought and ReAct, can benefit from our structure-oriented analysis. In addition to empirical investigations, we leverage the probabilistic graphical model to theoretically explain why our structure-oriented analysis can improve the LLM reasoning process. To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA), that can better enforce the reasoning process following our structure-oriented analysis by refinement techniques and is equipped with external knowledge retrieval capability to reduce factual errors. Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods. Finally, the system not only improves reasoning accuracy in complex tasks but also demonstrates robustness against potential attacks that corrupt the reasoning process.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.

Builds on

31 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey20 Dec
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models6 Oct

Other references · 29

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  8. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  9. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  10. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  11. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  12. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
17 more
  1. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
  2. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 886
  3. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
  4. 2023FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentationcited by 318
  5. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 284
  6. 2022Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Surveycited by 252
  7. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Sciencecited by 225
  8. 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representationscited by 205
  9. 2023Chain-of-Knowledge: Grounding Large Language Models via Dynamic Knowledge Adapting over Heterogeneous Sourcescited by 122
  10. 2024AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platformcited by 121
  11. 2023Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experiencecited by 103
  12. 2022Compositional Semantic Parsing with Large Language Modelscited by 95
  13. 2024BadChain: Backdoor Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Modelscited by 80
  14. 2023Exploring Code Analysis: Zero-Shot Insights on Syntax and Semantics with LLMscited by 19
  15. 2024Preemptive Answer "Attacks" on Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 19
  16. 2023Why Can Large Language Models Generate Correct Chain-of-Thoughts?cited by 16
  17. 2022ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Agent Instructs Large Language Models to be General Zero-Shot Reasoners
  2. 2026The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes
  3. 2025A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems
  4. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains
  5. 2025Agent-Based Detection and Resolution of Incompleteness and Ambiguity in Interactions with Large Language Models
  6. 2024LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models
  7. 2023SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning
  8. 2022Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners