mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probing Ranking LLMs: A Mechanistic Analysis for Information Retrieval

arXiv 2410.18527 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer networks, particularly those achieving performance comparable to GPT models, are well known for their robust feature extraction abilities. However, the nature of these extracted features and their alignment with human-engineered ones remain unexplored. In this work, we investigate the internal mechanisms of state-of-the-art, fine-tuned LLMs for passage reranking. We employ a probing-based analysis to examine neuron activations in ranking LLMs, identifying the presence of known human-engineered and semantic features. Our study spans a broad range of feature categories, including lexical signals, document structure, query-document interactions, and complex semantic representations, to uncover underlying patterns influencing ranking decisions. Through experiments on four different ranking LLMs, we identify statistical IR features that are prominently encoded in LLM activations, as well as others that are notably missing. Furthermore, we analyze how these models respond to out-of-distribution queries and documents, revealing distinct generalization behaviors. By dissecting the latent representations within LLM activations, we aim to improve both the interpretability and effectiveness of ranking models. Our findings offer crucial insights for developing more transparent and reliable retrieval systems, and we release all necessary scripts and code to support further exploration.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.

Builds on

34 of 51 references.

References · 34

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  5. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  7. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  8. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  9. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  10. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  11. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  12. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
22 more
  1. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  2. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  3. 2020Supermasks in Superpositioncited by 223
  4. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
  5. 2014Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNscited by 178
  6. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
  7. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  8. 2020Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Maskscited by 97
  9. 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
  10. 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
  11. 2018Revisiting the Importance of Individual Units in CNNs via Ablationcited by 32
  12. 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
  13. 2020ABNIRML: Analyzing the Behavior of Neural IR Modelscited by 23
  14. 2019A study on the Interpretability of Neural Retrieval Models using DeepSHAPcited by 19
  15. 2018EXS: Explainable Search Using Local Model Agnostic Interpretabilitycited by 18
  16. 2020A White Box Analysis of ColBERTcited by 14
  17. 2021Match Your Words! A Study of Lexical Matching in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 10
  18. 2024Axiomatic Causal Interventions for Reverse Engineering Relevance Computation in Neural Retrieval Modelscited by 8
  19. 2022Rank-LIME: Local Model-Agnostic Feature Attribution for Learning to Rankcited by 7
  20. 2021A Linguistic Study on Relevance Modeling in Information Retrievalcited by 6
  21. 2021Explaining Documents' Relevance to Search Queriescited by 5
  22. 2022Finding Inverse Document Frequency Information in BERTcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.