mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ABNIRML: Analyzing the Behavior of Neural IR Models

arXiv 2011.00696 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2020cs.CL cs.IRcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pretrained contextualized language models such as BERT and T5 have established a new state-of-the-art for ad-hoc search. However, it is not yet well-understood why these methods are so effective, what makes some variants more effective than others, and what pitfalls they may have. We present a new comprehensive framework for Analyzing the Behavior of Neural IR ModeLs (ABNIRML), which includes new types of diagnostic probes that allow us to test several characteristics -- such as writing styles, factuality, sensitivity to paraphrasing and word order -- that are not addressed by previous techniques. To demonstrate the value of the framework, we conduct an extensive empirical study that yields insights into the factors that contribute to the neural model's gains, and identify potential unintended biases the models exhibit. Some of our results confirm conventional wisdom, like that recent neural ranking models rely less on exact term overlap with the query, and instead leverage richer linguistic information, evidenced by their higher sensitivity to word and sentence order. Other results are more surprising, such as that some models (e.g., T5 and ColBERT) are biased towards factually correct (rather than simply relevant) texts. Further, some characteristics vary even for the same base language model, and other characteristics can appear due to random variations during model training.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023"According to ...": Prompting Language Models Improves Quoting from Pre-Training Datacited by 42
  2. 2025Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 29
  3. 2022What Are You Token About? Dense Retrieval as Distributions Over the Vocabularycited by 28
  4. 2023NevIR: Negation in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 28
  5. 2023When do Generative Query and Document Expansions Fail? A Comprehensive Study Across Methods, Retrievers, and Datasetscited by 25
  6. 2022Open Domain Multi-document Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of Model Brittleness under Retrievalcited by 20
  7. 2025Collapse of Dense Retrievers: Short, Early, and Literal Biases Outranking Factual Evidencecited by 16
  8. 2024Robust Neural Information Retrieval: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 15
  9. 2023DORIS-MAE: Scientific Document Retrieval using Multi-level Aspect-based Queriescited by 11
  10. 2021Match Your Words! A Study of Lexical Matching in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 10
  11. 2023An Attribution Method for Siamese Encoderscited by 8
  12. 2023Representation biases in sentence transformerscited by 7
11 more
  1. 2024Approximate Attributions for Off-the-Shelf Siamese Transformerscited by 7
  2. 2025Pathway to Relevance: How Cross-Encoders Implement a Semantic Variant of BM25cited by 6
  3. 2025How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspectivecited by 6
  4. 2022Entity-Conditioned Question Generation for Robust Attention Distribution in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 5
  5. 2022Positional Bias in Long-Document Ranking: Impact, Assessment, and Mitigationcited by 2
  6. 2024Probing Ranking LLMs: A Mechanistic Analysis for Information Retrievalcited by 2
  7. 2022The Inefficiency of Language Models in Scholarly Retrieval: An Experimental Walk-throughcited by 1
  8. 2022The Role of Complex NLP in Transformers for Text Ranking?cited by 1
  9. 2022Explainability of Text Processing and Retrieval Methods: A Surveycited by 0
  10. 2026Matching Meaning at Scale: Evaluating Semantic Search for 18th-Century Intellectual History through the Case of Lockecited by 0
  11. 2026Do Neural Retrievers Prefer Certain Documents? Evidence of Learned Relevance Priorscited by 0