Graph Pre-Training Models Are Strong Anomaly Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Anomaly Detection (GAD) is a challenging and practical research topic where Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently shown promising results. The effectiveness of existing GNNs in GAD has been mainly attributed to the simultaneous learning of node representations and the classifier in an end-to-end manner. Meanwhile, graph pre-training, the two-stage learning paradigm such as DGI and GraphMAE, has shown potential in leveraging unlabeled graph data to enhance downstream tasks, yet its impact on GAD remains under-explored. In this work, we show that graph pre-training models are strong graph anomaly detectors. Specifically, we demonstrate that pre-training is highly competitive, markedly outperforming the state-of-the-art end-to-end training models when faced with limited supervision. To understand this phenomenon, we further uncover pre-training enhances the detection of distant, under-represented, unlabeled anomalies that go beyond 2-hop neighborhoods of known anomalies, shedding light on its superior performance against end-to-end models. Moreover, we extend our examination to the potential of pre-training in graph-level anomaly detection. We envision this work to stimulate a re-evaluation of pre-training's role in GAD and offer valuable insights for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.
Builds on
31 of 71 references.
References · 31
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 651
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 535
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
- 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 443
- 2021Graph Self-Supervised Learning: A Surveycited by 289
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
19 more
- 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 185
- 2021Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via Bootstrappingcited by 184
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning of Graph Neural Networks: A Unified Reviewcited by 184
- 2020A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detectioncited by 150
- 2021From Canonical Correlation Analysis to Self-supervised Graph Neural Networkscited by 138
- 2023GraphMAE2: A Decoding-Enhanced Masked Self-Supervised Graph Learnercited by 131
- 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
- 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 81
- 2022BOND: Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Node Detection on Static Attributed Graphscited by 80
- 2021Deep Graph-level Anomaly Detection by Glocal Knowledge Distillationcited by 67
- 2018GeniePath: Graph Neural Networks with Adaptive Receptive Pathscited by 66
- 2022DGraph: A Large-Scale Financial Dataset for Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 63
- 2023GADBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Supervised Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 57
- 2020On Using Classification Datasets to Evaluate Graph-Level Outlier Detection: Peculiar Observations and New Insightscited by 53
- 2022Spectral Feature Augmentation for Graph Contrastive Learning and Beyondcited by 49
- 2022Raising the Bar in Graph-level Anomaly Detectioncited by 45
- 2021Graph Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detectioncited by 22
- 2022DAGAD: Data Augmentation for Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 20
- 2022Mul-GAD: a semi-supervised graph anomaly detection framework via aggregating multi-view informationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.