Data Publishing in Mechanics and Dynamics: Challenges, Guidelines, and Examples from Engineering Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data-based methods have gained increasing importance in engineering, especially but not only driven by successes with deep artificial neural networks. Success stories are prevalent, e.g., in areas such as data-driven modeling, control and automation, as well as surrogate modeling for accelerated simulation. Beyond engineering, generative and large-language models are increasingly helping with tasks that, previously, were solely associated with creative human processes. Thus, it seems timely to seek artificial-intelligence-support for engineering design tasks to automate, help with, or accelerate purpose-built designs of engineering systems, e.g., in mechanics and dynamics, where design so far requires a lot of specialized knowledge. However, research-wise, compared to established, predominantly first-principles-based methods, the datasets used for training, validation, and test become an almost inherent part of the overall methodology. Thus, data publishing becomes just as important in (data-driven) engineering science as appropriate descriptions of conventional methodology in publications in the past. This article analyzes the value and challenges of data publishing in mechanics and dynamics, in particular regarding engineering design tasks, showing that the latter raise also challenges and considerations not typical in fields where data-driven methods have been booming originally. Possible ways to deal with these challenges are discussed and a set of examples from across different design problems shows how data publishing can be put into practice. The analysis, discussions, and examples are based on the research experience made in a priority program of the German research foundation focusing on research on artificially intelligent design assistants in mechanics and dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.
Builds on
14 of 61 references.
References · 14
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
- 2021Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design: A Reviewcited by 103
- 2024DrivAerNet++: A Large-Scale Multimodal Car Dataset with Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 74
- 2021Codabench: Flexible, Easy-to-Use and Reproducible Benchmarking Platformcited by 65
- 2021BIKED: A Dataset for Computational Bicycle Design with Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 27
- 2023Deep Learning in Deterministic Computational Mechanicscited by 21
- 2022LINKS: A dataset of a hundred million planar linkage mechanisms for data-driven kinematic designcited by 9
- 2024NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Harnessing Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics in Airfoil Designcited by 8
- 2023Learning to Predict Structural Vibrationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.