mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Temporal Relational Reasoning of Large Language Models for Detecting Stock Portfolio Crashes

arXiv 2410.17266 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024q-fin.RM cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Stock portfolios are often exposed to rare consequential events (e.g., 2007 global financial crisis, 2020 COVID-19 stock market crash), as they do not have enough historical information to learn from. Large Language Models (LLMs) now present a possible tool to tackle this problem, as they can generalize across their large corpus of training data and perform zero-shot reasoning on new events, allowing them to detect possible portfolio crash events without requiring specific training data. However, detecting portfolio crashes is a complex problem that requires more than reasoning abilities. Investors need to dynamically process the impact of each new piece of information found in news articles, analyze the relational network of impacts across different events and portfolio stocks, as well as understand the temporal context between impacts across time-steps, in order to obtain the aggregated impact on the target portfolio. In this work, we propose an algorithmic framework named Temporal Relational Reasoning (TRR). It seeks to emulate the spectrum of human cognitive capabilities used for complex problem-solving, which include brainstorming, memory, attention and reasoning. Through extensive experiments, we show that TRR is able to outperform state-of-the-art techniques on detecting stock portfolio crashes, and demonstrate how each of the proposed components help to contribute to its performance through an ablation study. Additionally, we further explore the possible applications of TRR by extending it to other related complex problems, such as the detection of possible global crisis events in Macroeconomics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

6 of 70 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 385
  2. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 233
  3. 2023ChatDB: Augmenting LLMs with Databases as Their Symbolic Memorycited by 140
  4. 2023Making Large Language Models Perform Better in Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 48
  5. 2023ChatGPT Informed Graph Neural Network for Stock Movement Predictioncited by 41
  6. 2024Enhancing Financial Market Predictions: Causality-Driven Feature Selectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Temporal Data Meets LLM -- Explainable Financial Time Series Forecasting
  2. 2026Reasoning through Verifiable Forecast Actions: Consistency-Grounded RL for Financial LLMs
  3. 2025Knowledge Graph Construction for Stock Markets with LLM-Based Explainable Reasoning
  4. 2026The Price of Thought: Does Test-Time Reasoning Pay in LLM Trading?
  5. 2026Reasoning Externalization for Faithful Large Language Model Narratives of Stock Return Predictions
  6. 2025FinCARE: Financial Causal Analysis with Reasoning and Evidence
  7. 2025Reasoning on Time-Series for Financial Technical Analysis
  8. 2025Do Large Language Models (LLMs) Understand Chronology?