mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Steering Optimization: Autonomous Preference Optimization for Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.17131 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

The key to effective alignment lies in high-quality preference data. Recent research has focused on automated alignment, which involves developing alignment systems with minimal human intervention. However, prior research has predominantly focused on developing data generation methods, while insufficient attention has been paid to quality control mechanisms, which often produce inaccurate and unhelpful data, leading to unpredictable benefits during iterative optimization. In this paper, we present Self-Steering Optimization (SSO), an algorithm that autonomously generates high-quality preference data, eliminating manual annotation requirements. SSO employs a specialized optimization objective to build a data generator from the policy model itself, which is used to produce accurate and on-policy data. We demonstrate SSO's effectiveness through comprehensive experiments on two series of models: Llama 3 and Qwen 2. Our evaluation across diverse benchmarks shows that SSO consistently outperforms baselines in human preference alignment and reward optimization. Further analysis validates SSO as a scalable framework for preference optimization, benefiting the advancement in automated alignment techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Self-Supervised Alignment with Mutual Information: Learning to Follow Principles without Preference Labels22 Apr
  2. 2024Impact of Preference Noise on the Alignment Performance of Generative Language Models15 Apr
  3. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  4. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 22

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  9. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  11. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
  12. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 557
10 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  2. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  3. 2024V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasonerscited by 217
  4. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
  5. 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 185
  6. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  7. 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'cited by 115
  8. 2023Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactionscited by 78
  9. 2023Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution Feedbackcited by 70
  10. 2024Towards Scalable Automated Alignment of LLMs: A Surveycited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment
  2. 2025SGPO: Self-Generated Preference Optimization based on Self-Improver
  3. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
  4. 2025Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
  5. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
  6. 2025Toward Preference-aligned Large Language Models via Residual-based Model Steering
  7. 2025Is On-Policy Data always the Best Choice for Direct Preference Optimization-based LM Alignment?
  8. 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation