Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative models at times produce "invalid" outputs, such as images with generation artifacts and unnatural sounds. Validity-constrained distribution learning attempts to address this problem by requiring that the learned distribution have a provably small fraction of its mass in invalid parts of space -- something which standard loss minimization does not always ensure. To this end, a learner in this model can guide the learning via "validity queries", which allow it to ascertain the validity of individual examples. Prior work on this problem takes a worst-case stance, showing that proper learning requires an exponential number of validity queries, and demonstrating an improper algorithm which -- while generating guarantees in a wide-range of settings -- makes an atypical polynomial number of validity queries. In this work, we take a first step towards characterizing regimes where guaranteeing validity is easier than in the worst-case. We show that when the data distribution lies in the model class and the log-loss is minimized, the number of samples required to ensure validity has a weak dependence on the validity requirement. Additionally, we show that when the validity region belongs to a VC-class, a limited number of validity queries are often sufficient.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 283
- 2017Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resizecited by 37
- 2020Analysis of KNN Density Estimationcited by 28
- 2022Data Redaction from Pre-trained GANscited by 18
- 2018Actively Avoiding Nonsense in Generative Modelscited by 12
- 2020Blur, Noise, and Compression Robust Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 9
- 2022Proper losses for discrete generative modelscited by 4
- 2019Toward a Characterization of Loss Functions for Distribution Learningcited by 3
- 2017Learning a Generative Model for Validity in Complex Discrete Structurescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.