mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Do Multilingual Language Models Remember Facts?

arXiv 2410.14387 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) store and retrieve vast amounts of factual knowledge acquired during pre-training. Prior research has localized and identified mechanisms behind knowledge recall; however, it has only focused on English monolingual models. The question of how these mechanisms generalize to non-English languages and multilingual LLMs remains unexplored. In this paper, we address this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of three multilingual LLMs. First, we show that previously identified recall mechanisms in English largely apply to multilingual contexts, with nuances based on language and architecture. Next, through patching intermediate representations, we localize the role of language during recall, finding that subject enrichment is language-independent, while object extraction is language-dependent. Additionally, we discover that the last token representation acts as a Function Vector (FV), encoding both the language of the query and the content to be extracted from the subject. Furthermore, in decoder-only LLMs, FVs compose these two pieces of information in two separate stages. These insights reveal unique mechanisms in multilingual LLMs for recalling information, highlighting the need for new methodologies -- such as knowledge evaluation, fact editing, and knowledge acquisition -- that are specifically tailored for multilingual LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 11; 2026: 8.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Separating Tongue from Thought: Activation Patching Reveals Language-Agnostic Concept Representations in Transformerscited by 42
  2. 2025Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipelinecited by 20
  3. 2025The Emergence of Abstract Thought in Large Language Models Beyond Any Languagecited by 20
  4. 2025Language Models' Factuality Depends on the Language of Inquirycited by 14
  5. 2025Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missingcited by 14
  6. 2026LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual Tokens in LLMscited by 9
  7. 2025Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Confusion in English-Centric Large Language Modelscited by 8
  8. 2025Unboxing the Black Box: Mechanistic Interpretability for Algorithmic Understanding of Neural Networkscited by 6
  9. 2025On the Entity-Level Alignment in Crosslingual Consistencycited by 4
  10. 2025Rethinking Cross-lingual Gaps from a Statistical Viewpointcited by 4
  11. 2025Iterative Multilingual Spectral Attribute Erasurecited by 1
  12. 2025How Chain-of-Thought Works? Tracing Information Flow from Decoding, Projection, and Activationcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026Two Pathways to Truthfulness: On the Intrinsic Encoding of LLM Hallucinationscited by 1
  2. 2026Polyglots or Multitudes? Multilingual LLM Answers to Value-laden Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 1
  3. 2026Divergent large language model predictions from convergent representations in ambiguous word pairscited by 1
  4. 2026Who Says What: Symbolic Trimodal Binding Mechanisms in Audio-Visual LLMscited by 1
  5. 2025Medical Interpretability and Knowledge Maps of Large Language Modelscited by 0
  6. 2026FactNet: A Billion-Scale Knowledge Graph for Multilingual Factual Groundingcited by 0
  7. 2026Exploring Language-Agnosticity in Function Vectors: A Case Study in Machine Translationcited by 0
  8. 2026Same Values, Different Languages? From Multilingual Probing to Steering LLMs Toward Chinese Social Valuescited by 0