SSET: Swapping-Sliding Explanation for Time Series Classifiers in Affect Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Local explanation of machine learning (ML) models has recently received significant attention due to its ability to reduce ambiguities about why the models make specific decisions. Extensive efforts have been invested to address explainability for different data types, particularly images. However, the work on multivariate time series data is limited. A possible reason is that the conflation of time and other variables in time series data can cause the generated explanations to be incomprehensible to humans. In addition, some efforts on time series fall short of providing accurate explanations as they either ignore a context in the time domain or impose differentiability requirements on the ML models. Such restrictions impede their ability to provide valid explanations in real-world applications and non-differentiable ML settings. In this paper, we propose a swapping--sliding decision explanation for multivariate time series classifiers, called SSET. The proposal consists of swapping and sliding stages, by which salient sub-sequences causing significant drops in the prediction score are presented as explanations. In the former stage, the important variables are detected by swapping the series of interest with close train data from target classes. In the latter stage, the salient observations of these variables are explored by sliding a window over each time step. Additionally, the model measures the importance of different variables over time in a novel way characterized by multiple factors. We leverage SSET on affect detection domain where evaluations are performed on two real-world physiological time series datasets, WESAD and MAHNOB-HCI, and a deep convolutional classifier, CN-Waterfall. This classifier has shown superior performance to prior models to detect human affective states. Comparing SSET with several benchmarks, including LIME, integrated gradients, and Dynamask, we found..
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
19 of 33 references.
References · 19
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,368
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,203
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 971
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 238
- 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
- 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
- 2021Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Maskscited by 73
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
7 more
- 2022Generating Sparse Counterfactual Explanations For Multivariate Time Seriescited by 11
- 2018Focusing on What is Relevant: Time-Series Learning and Understanding using Attentioncited by 8
- 2020TSInsight: A local-global attribution framework for interpretability in time-series datacited by 8
- 2019TSXplain: Demystification of DNN Decisions for Time-Series using Natural Language and Statistical Featurescited by 5
- 2019Explaining an increase in predicted risk for clinical alertscited by 5
- 2019Deep-Aligned Convolutional Neural Network for Skeleton-based Action Recognition and Segmentationcited by 3
- 2020XAI-P-T: A Brief Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence from Practice to Theorycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.