A Claim Decomposition Benchmark for Long-form Answer Verification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advancement of LLMs has significantly boosted the performance of complex long-form question answering tasks. However, one prominent issue of LLMs is the generated "hallucination" responses that are not factual. Consequently, attribution for each claim in responses becomes a common solution to improve the factuality and verifiability. Existing researches mainly focus on how to provide accurate citations for the response, which largely overlook the importance of identifying the claims or statements for each response. To bridge this gap, we introduce a new claim decomposition benchmark, which requires building system that can identify atomic and checkworthy claims for LLM responses. Specifically, we present the Chinese Atomic Claim Decomposition Dataset (CACDD), which builds on the WebCPM dataset with additional expert annotations to ensure high data quality. The CACDD encompasses a collection of 500 human-annotated question-answer pairs, including a total of 4956 atomic claims. We further propose a new pipeline for human annotation and describe the challenges of this task. In addition, we provide experiment results on zero-shot, few-shot and fine-tuned LLMs as baselines. The results show that the claim decomposition is highly challenging and requires further explorations. All code and data are publicly available at urlhttps://github.com/FBzzh/CACDD.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 287
- 2023WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipediacited by 120
- 2023Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wildcited by 110
- 2023WebCPM: Interactive Web Search for Chinese Long-form Question Answeringcited by 93
- 2023Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Modelscited by 72
- 2022Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claimscited by 66
5 more
- 2024A Closer Look at Claim Decompositioncited by 41
- 2023Sub-Sentence Encoder: Contrastive Learning of Propositional Semantic Representationscited by 20
- 2024Can LLMs Evaluate Complex Attribution in QA? Automatic Benchmarking using Knowledge Graphscited by 17
- 2024Minimal Evidence Group Identification for Claim Verificationcited by 5
- 2019DisSim: A Discourse-Aware Syntactic Text Simplification Frameworkfor English and Germancited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.