mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient and Effective Universal Adversarial Attack against Vision-Language Pre-training Models

arXiv 2410.11639 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2024cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language pre-training (VLP) models, trained on large-scale image-text pairs, have become widely used across a variety of downstream vision-and-language (V+L) tasks. This widespread adoption raises concerns about their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Non-universal adversarial attacks, while effective, are often impractical for real-time online applications due to their high computational demands per data instance. Recently, universal adversarial perturbations (UAPs) have been introduced as a solution, but existing generator-based UAP methods are significantly time-consuming. To overcome the limitation, we propose a direct optimization-based UAP approach, termed DO-UAP, which significantly reduces resource consumption while maintaining high attack performance. Specifically, we explore the necessity of multimodal loss design and introduce a useful data augmentation strategy. Extensive experiments conducted on three benchmark VLP datasets, six popular VLP models, and three classical downstream tasks demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of DO-UAP. Specifically, our approach drastically decreases the time consumption by 23-fold while achieving a better attack performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 35 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2024.

Builds on

35 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024One Perturbation is Enough: On Generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations against Vision-Language Pre-training Models8 Jun
  2. 2024Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Vision-Language Pre-trained Models9 May
  3. 2024Boosting Transferability in Vision-Language Attacks via Diversification along the Intersection Region of Adversarial Trajectory19 Mar
  4. 2023Set-level Guidance Attack: Boosting Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models26 Jul
  5. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models19 Jun

Other references · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
  7. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  8. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  9. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  10. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  11. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  12. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
18 more
  1. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  2. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  3. 2021Multi-Grained Vision Language Pre-Training: Aligning Texts with Visual Conceptscited by 255
  4. 2019Visual Entailment: A Novel Task for Fine-Grained Image Understandingcited by 250
  5. 2021Scaling Up Vision-Language Pre-training for Image Captioningcited by 196
  6. 2022VLP: A Survey on Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 159
  7. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  8. 2022CLIP Models are Few-shot Learners: Empirical Studies on VQA and Visual Entailmentcited by 113
  9. 2019Cycle-Consistency for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 105
  10. 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 85
  11. 2016A Comprehensive Survey on Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 62
  12. 2020Visual Grounding of Learned Physical Modelscited by 54
  13. 2024Legilimens: Practical and Unified Content Moderation for Large Language Model Servicescited by 13
  14. 2019On Single Source Robustness in Deep Fusion Modelscited by 12
  15. 2024Texture Re-scalable Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 9
  16. 2024RACONTEUR: A Knowledgeable, Insightful, and Portable LLM-Powered Shell Command Explainercited by 9
  17. 2024FoolSDEdit: Deceptively Steering Your Edits Towards Targeted Attribute-aware Distributioncited by 2
  18. 2024MIP: CLIP-based Image Reconstruction from PEFT Gradientscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Exploiting Vision Encoder Vulnerabilities for Universal Adversarial Perturbations on Large Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026A Two-Stage Globally-Diverse Adversarial Attack for Vision-Language Pre-training Models
  3. 2026Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
  4. 2026VisInject: Disruption != Injection -- A Dual-Dimension Evaluation of Universal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024Towards Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models: Insights from Design Choices and Prompt Formatting Techniques
  6. 2024Multimodal Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models by Leveraging One-To-Many Relationships
  7. 2026Hierarchical Refinement of Universal Multimodal Attacks on Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Double Visual Defense: Adversarial Pre-training and Instruction Tuning for Improving Vision-Language Model Robustness